1 |
[quote]Most kick votes are the result of people playing like shit in an intentional-looking fashion. [/quote]
|
1 |
[quote]Most kick votes are the result of people playing like shit in an intentional-looking fashion. [/quote]
|
2 |
\n
|
2 |
\n
|
3 |
I
don't
think
it
is
their
place
to
decide
if
someone
is
or
is
not
intentionally
playing
like
shit,
no
less
empowering
them
to
create
temporary
bans.
I
see
these
kicks
way
too
often
for
no
stated
reason
and
I
do
not
think
it
is
conductive
to
retaining
or
growing
this
player
base
to
be
kicking
anyone
who
plays
or
is
to
be
perceived
to
play
subpar
for
one
game.
I
had
a
game
tonight
where
people
were
tired
of
useless
spam
votes
being
called.
One
explicitly
stated
they
were
so
tired
of
the
useless
exit
votes
that
they
were
ready
to
call
it
quits
(
@Scholar_NZ
)
.
So
after
seeing
another
attempted
exit
vote
I
tried
to
kick
the
exit
initiator
(
or
who
I
thought
was
the
culprit)
with
a
clearly
defined
reason.
I
was
later
then
almost
kicked
for
absolutely
no
reason.
|
3 |
I
don't
think
it
is
their
place
to
decide
if
someone
is
or
is
not
intentionally
playing
like
shit,
no
less
empowering
them
to
create
temporary
bans.
I
see
these
kicks
way
too
often
for
no
stated
reason
and
I
do
not
think
it
is
conductive
to
retaining
or
growing
this
player
base
to
be
kicking
anyone
who
plays
or
is
to
be
perceived
to
play
subpar
for
one
game.
I
had
a
game
tonight
where
people
were
tired
of
useless
spam
votes
being
called.
One
explicitly
stated
they
were
so
tired
of
the
useless
exit
votes
that
they
were
ready
to
call
it
quits
(
@Scholar_NZ
)
.
So
after
seeing
another
attempted
exit
vote
I
tried
to
kick
the
exit
initiator
(
or
who
I
thought
was
the
culprit)
with
a
clearly
defined
reason.
I
was
later
then
almost
kicked
(
3/4
yes
votes)
for
absolutely
no
reason.
|
4 |
\n
|
4 |
\n
|
5 |
This is the state of our game. Useless votes being spammed and spurious kick votes plague this community while nothing is done socially or administratively.
|
5 |
This is the state of our game. Useless votes being spammed and spurious kick votes plague this community while nothing is done socially or administratively.
|
6 |
\n
|
6 |
\n
|
7 |
To
further
show
you
how
bad
this
has
gotten,
I
saw
one
user
tonight
complain
about
playing
the
same
map
twice,
called
an
exit
vote,
then
tried
to
call
a
start
vote
when
the
game
was
exited.
Not
even
joking.
Then
I
saw
one
player
complain
about
"maps
being
too
small"
while
voting
for
maps
that
were
too
small
and
calling
exit
votes.
But
this
is
a
tangent.
|
7 |
To
further
show
you
how
bad
this
has
gotten,
I
saw
one
user
tonight
complain
about
playing
the
same
map
twice,
called
an
exit
vote,
then
tried
to
call
a
start
vote
[b]immediately
after[/b]
when
the
game
was
exited
and
a
new
replacement
map.
Not
even
joking.
Then
I
saw
one
player
complain
about
"maps
being
too
small"
while
voting
for
maps
that
were
too
small
and
calling
exit
votes.
But
this
is
a
tangent.
|
8 |
\n
|
8 |
\n
|
9 |
[quote]Who cares about the mere act of calling a vote? It has no effect on anything.[/quote]
|
9 |
[quote]Who cares about the mere act of calling a vote? It has no effect on anything.[/quote]
|
|
|
10 |
\n
|
|
|
11 |
It does have an affect when the meme votes pass on occasion and someone gets kicked for spurious reasons due to vote-k syndrome. It clogs up people's attention, it clogs up resign votes, and over time it gets old. Really old. It gets old when I see 3-4 kick votes a day because someone gets a little upset over losing that they want to kick people for what they perceive to be subpar play. In the ALL WELCOME room even. This is beside the point as I asked what the purpose of a kick without a reason is from a sociological standpoint. How is it enforcing any norms if the norms it is trying to enforce aren't defined or a reason given? The offender is left questioning what they did and the rest of the group is left questioning what they did. We can assume for that matter that the offender might have been playing below expectations, which quite frankly is a stupid reason to kick anyone unless they're actually doing negative contributing things (such as TK or reclaiming allied stuff). Let's put this to an analogy:
|
|
|
12 |
You are arrested (kicked). The police do not even tell you on what charge you're arrested for. Why is this bad? In order for punishment (for normal social people) to be effective, a wrong must be conveyed to associate an effect to the cause of perpetrating some offense. If that wrong is not conveyed effectively, then you run into the issue of having an ineffective punishment system. This is one of my criticisms of the current kick command as a socialization tool.
|
|
|
13 |
\n
|
|
|
14 |
Worse yet: let's look at it from a person's perspective who is starting to engage with the community. They play their first multiplayer game and they're exposed to a "random" kick vote of someone who is "perceived to play poorly (whether intentionally or not)" by someone else and a kick vote is called. How does this player associate the punishment with the cause? They see a player kicking @Dhrama_Khan and go "why are they kicking him?"-> no answer -> speculation. Congratulations, you have ineffective socialization. This is why admin bans and mutes have a reason and get communicated with by @Nightwatch to the offender. If you get banned for a day and the reason is "Teamkilling in B99999", you associate teamkilling with getting banned. (That aside, I wished that they'd bring back ban/mutes being announced in #zk for this exact reason, but that's a topic for another day)
|
10 |
\n
|
15 |
\n
|
11 |
It
does
have
an
affect
when
the
meme
votes
pass
on
occasion
and
someone
gets
kicked
for
spurious
reasons
due
to
vote-k
syndrome.
It
clogs
up
people's
attention,
it
clogs
up
resign
votes,
and
over
time
it
gets
old.
Really
old.
It
gets
old
when
I
see
3-4
kick
votes
a
day
because
someone
gets
a
little
upset
over
losing
that
they
want
to
kick
people
for
what
they
perceive
to
be
subpar
play.
In
the
ALL
WELCOME
room
even.
This
is
beside
the
point
as
I
asked
what
the
purpose
of
a
kick
without
a
reason
is
from
a
sociological
standpoint.
How
is
it
enforcing
any
norms
if
the
norms
it
is
trying
to
enforce
aren't
defined
or
a
reason
given?
The
offender
is
left
questioning
what
they
did
and
the
rest
of
the
group
is
left
questioning
what
they
did.
We
can
assume
for
that
matter
that
the
offender
might
have
been
playing
below
expectations,
which
quite
frankly
is
a
stupid
reason
to
kick
anyone
unless
they're
actually
doing
negative
contributing
things
(
such
as
TK
or
reclaiming
allied
stuff)
.
|
16 |
Now
onto
further
elaboration
of
why
kicking
players
for
subjectively
poor
performance
is
bad:
|
|
|
17 |
Going back to the example mentioned before. You have someone just starting to engage in the community. They are looking at player behavior for norms. They see these random kick votes and let's say they understood the reason that this person was kicked for ("bad play"). They now have to deal with anxiety and worrying about getting kicked or are repulsed by this idea and never engage in zero-k again. Zero-K doesn't grow and inevitably dies off all because some players get a little fussy and immediately escalate to kick voting a poor performer. This is not a desirable outcome.
|
12 |
\n
|
18 |
\n
|
13 |
[quote]Since it requires a majority of votes to pass why does a reason need to be stated?[/quote]
|
19 |
[quote]Since it requires a majority of votes to pass why does a reason need to be stated?[/quote]
|
14 |
For
the
record,
it
requires
only
a
marginal
majority
of
the
team.
Half
plus
one
if
I
recall
correctly.
Which
makes
abusing
it
in
larger
games
easier.
|
20 |
For
the
record,
it
requires
only
a
marginal
majority
of
the
team.
Half
plus
one
if
I
recall
correctly.
Which
makes
abusing
it
in
larger
games
easier
(
double
so
thanks
to
Clan
balance
putting
your
buddies
who
will
back
you
up
in
with
you)
.
|