Loading...
  OR  Zero-K Name:    Password:   

Post edit history

B788670 2 on Vantage v1.0 (Multiplayer)

To display differences between versions, select one or more edits in the list using checkboxes and click "diff selected"
Post edit history
Date Editor Before After
10/30/2019 8:53:43 PMCArankGalamesh before revert after revert
10/30/2019 8:52:14 PMCArankGalamesh before revert after revert
10/30/2019 8:43:59 PMCArankGalamesh before revert after revert
Before After
1 @Steel_Blue 1 @Steel_Blue
2 \n 2 \n
3 Hey man I never said that I played perfectly, but I question what your takeaway is here. 3 Hey man I never said that I played perfectly, but I question what your takeaway is here.
4 \n 4 \n
5 At any point in time I actively challenge 3 fronts and repeatedly catch unprotected emmissaries with raiders/assaults. Some form of bad macro management can still be expected from me I think. I'm trying, but I'm not at that level yet. 5 At any point in time I actively challenge 3 fronts and repeatedly catch unprotected emmissaries with raiders/assaults. Some form of bad macro management can still be expected from me I think. I'm trying, but I'm not at that level yet.
6 \n 6 \n
7 Look at all the reclaim my opponent has and how map control completely switches around after I lose my units trying to destroy his factories. That's about half way through. At this point I just spam thugs aspis merlin and add a funnelweb or two. I then turn my brain off and just use my ball to chip at my opponent until I win. That's far more telling than anything else I think. 7 Look at all the reclaim my opponent has and how map control completely switches around after I lose my units trying to destroy his factories. That's about half way through. At this point I just spam thugs aspis merlin and add a funnelweb or two. I then turn my brain off and just use my ball to chip at my opponent until I win. That's far more telling than anything else I think.
8 \n 8 \n
9 Playing out of my mind rewarded me with a dead army trying to kill stuff, and turning my brain off handed me the game on a platter. 9 Playing out of my mind rewarded me with a dead army trying to kill stuff, and turning my brain off handed me the game on a platter.
10 \n 10 \n
11 For sure I heavily disliked the firewalkers, but it doesn't make sense to me that I could come back. I also think that if towers had less HP I would have easily taken the game much sooner, perhaps before the firewalkers. 11 For sure I heavily disliked the firewalkers, but it doesn't make sense to me that I could come back. I also think that if towers had less HP I would have easily taken the game much sooner, perhaps before the firewalkers.
12 \n 12 \n
13 EDIT: Also faradays splash and slash goes through shields, does it not? Like if I send thugs close together so they link, wouldn't they all get hit by the faraday? 13 EDIT: Also faradays splash and slash goes through shields, does it not? Like if I send thugs close together so they link, wouldn't they all get hit by the faraday?
14 \n 14 \n
15 Seems to me every time I try to take out faraday with thugs, the faradays work wonders. Double farday+any support seems like a recipe to permaemp anthing but, say, tanks. 15 Seems to me every time I try to take out faraday with thugs, the faradays work wonders. Double farday+any support seems like a recipe to permaemp anthing but, say, tanks.
16 \n 16 \n
17 This is why I'm not hating on emissaries right now. I think that I can kill them. What I dislike is how difficult it is to break towers unless I send tenfold value at it or switch to artil myself. 17 This is why I'm not hating on emissaries right now. I think that I can kill them. What I dislike is how difficult it is to break towers unless I send tenfold value at them or switch to artil myself.