1 |
"I'm not saying buff Glaives"
|
1 |
"I'm not saying buff Glaives"
|
|
|
2 |
was the original comment. and i agree. glaives are fine. i just found the latest bandit-buff a bit unnecessary.
|
|
|
3 |
\n
|
|
|
4 |
-if you should try to counter raiders with raiders or riots is pretty map-dependant. if you are forced to go riots in the very first minutes of the game, you lose a lot of momentum.
|
|
|
5 |
\n
|
|
|
6 |
-i already said somewhere else is that i find the whole cloaky-shield-matchup a bit weird. it´s not necesarily unbalanced, but counter-intuitive. if you can´t really use glaives it´s the shield-player that gets a theoretical speed-advantage.
|
|
|
7 |
\n
|
|
|
8 |
-maybe it´s just a lack of maps that support the cloaky-fac enough... in our mumble-games we generally prefer inculta or valiant saltscape, because the game tends to keep mobility viable for very long while still having fronts that demand heavier stuff. more of those maps would be really nice to have.
|