Loading...
  OR  Zero-K Name:    Password:   

Post edit history

High elo team game autohost?

To display differences between versions, select one or more edits in the list using checkboxes and click "diff selected"
Post edit history
Date Editor Before After
9/10/2019 2:31:11 AMAUrankAdminAquanim before revert after revert
9/10/2019 2:29:33 AMAUrankAdminAquanim before revert after revert
Before After
1 [quote]Just now we had 2 "newer" players which were seriously upset because we wanted to play high elo team games. 1 [quote]Just now we had 2 "newer" players which were seriously upset because we wanted to play high elo team games.
2 We had to constantly spec him and tell a red rank (1450 Elo) that he isnt a high Elo player multiple times.[/quote] 2 We had to constantly spec him and tell a red rank (1450 Elo) that he isnt a high Elo player multiple times.[/quote]
3 Besides the moderation precedent of allowing kicking for 'poor play', this is why I am strongly against player-managed unpassworded high-elo hosts. I am not sure that allowing room hosts to set lobby-enforced rating limits is a meaningful improvement. 3 Besides the moderation precedent of allowing kicking for 'poor play', this is why I am strongly against player-managed unpassworded high-elo hosts. I am not sure that allowing room hosts to set lobby-enforced rating limits is a meaningful improvement.
4 \n
5 To be clear, I'm not strongly against an autohost but I don't think the current arrangement (unless it is in passworded rooms) can continue in the long term.