Loading...
  OR  Zero-K Name:    Password:   

Post edit history

B754674 29 on Icy Run v2 (Multiplayer)

To display differences between versions, select one or more edits in the list using checkboxes and click "diff selected"
Post edit history
Date Editor Before After
8/5/2019 2:35:38 PMAUrankAdminAquanim before revert after revert
8/5/2019 2:34:52 PMAUrankAdminAquanim before revert after revert
8/5/2019 2:34:08 PMAUrankAdminAquanim before revert after revert
8/5/2019 2:32:51 PMAUrankAdminAquanim before revert after revert
8/5/2019 2:32:17 PMAUrankAdminAquanim before revert after revert
8/5/2019 2:30:21 PMAUrankAdminAquanim before revert after revert
Before After
1 There is not always an admin (let alone the several required for multiple perspectives on an ambiguous case) available to review a complicated hour long game promptly. 1 There is not always an admin (let alone the several required for multiple perspectives on an ambiguous case) available to review a complicated hour long game promptly.
2 \n 2 \n
3 With respect to @Rainbow33: 3 With respect to @Rainbow33:
4 \n 4 \n
5 We are unconvinced that @Rainbow33 originally set out to harm their team; the reclaiming constructors were given a fairly large area-reclaim order and the player's attention was occupied holding the front line. By the end the constructor being moved away after being Faradayed indicates they were probably aware then. However this moment comes after about six kick votes and a litany of abuse. @Rainbow33 has no prior reports or moderation history. A warning will be issued. 5 We are unconvinced that @Rainbow33 originally set out to harm their team; the reclaiming constructors were given a fairly large area-reclaim order and the player's attention was occupied holding the front line. By the end the constructor being moved away after being Faradayed indicates they were probably aware then. However this moment comes after about six kick votes and a litany of abuse. @Rainbow33 has no prior reports or moderation history. A warning will be issued.
6 \n 6 \n
7 With respect to @MrGreen8: 7 With respect to @MrGreen8:
8 \n 8 \n
9 Given that several players believed the best course of action was to assist @MrGreen8 in building the DRP, and at most five players were vocally against reclaiming the Zenith, there is insufficient cause to think that @MrGreen8 was trying to troll or harm his team. No action will be taken. 9 Given that several players believed the best course of action was to assist @MrGreen8 in building the DRP, and at most five players were vocally against reclaiming the Zenith, there is insufficient cause to think that @MrGreen8 was trying to troll or harm his team. No action will be taken.
10 \n 10 \n
11 A fair bit of the language directed at both of these players in-game was quite unbecoming. We don't intend to action any of it but do try to be less abusive in future. It does not, as a general rule, improve the situation. 11 A fair bit of the language directed at both of these players in-game was quite unbecoming. We don't intend to action any of it but do try to be less abusive in future. It does not, as a general rule, improve the situation.
12 \n
13 The question of whether rezzers or reclaimers should have priority is difficult to establish a reasonable general rule for.