1 |
First off let's start by staying in topic, so NO talk about infinity storage, changing status (like HP, etc), or anything off topic. The only topic/objective here is to reduce the number of units.
|
1 |
First off let's start by staying in topic, so NO talk about infinity storage, changing status (like HP, etc), or anything off topic. The only topic/objective here is to reduce the number of units.
|
2 |
\n
|
2 |
\n
|
3 |
I see lots people complaining that we have too many units, so what about fusioning Pylon and Storage and maybe even Caretaker (Caretaker would be the only unit left in game). Just so we can delete some rarely used units.
|
3 |
I see lots people complaining that we have too many units, so what about fusioning Pylon and Storage and maybe even Caretaker (Caretaker would be the only unit left in game). Just so we can delete some rarely used units.
|
4 |
\n
|
4 |
\n
|
5 |
Fusioning
Caretaker
too
may
look
a
bit
extreme,
but
if
we
do
it
there
may
be
more
points
to
retreat
and
repair
units,
just
set
it
to
default
Hold
Position
so
it
will
repair
ally
units
and
reclaim
automatic,
but
will
not
help
ally
to
BUILD
units,
so
no
"steal
metal"
from
you,
and
it
will
still
help
building
"your"
units
automatic
too.
And
if
you
want
you
can
change
it
move
status
later
too.
|
5 |
Fusioning
Caretaker
too
may
look
a
bit
extreme,
but
if
we
do
it
there
may
be
more
points
to
retreat
and
repair
units,
just
set
it
to
default
Hold
Position
so
it
will
repair
ally
units
and
reclaim
automatic,
but
will
not
help
ally
to
BUILD
units,
so
no
ally
can
"steal
metal"
from
you,
and
it
will
still
help
building
"your"
units
automatic
too.
And
if
you
want
you
can
change
it
move
status
later
too.
|
6 |
\n
|
6 |
\n
|
7 |
If
you
do
not
agree
about
Caretaker
fusion,
but
agree
with
Pylon
and
Storage
fusion
say
so,
and
if
you
what
NO
fusion
say
so
too.
|
7 |
If
you
do
not
agree
about
Caretaker
fusion,
but
agree
with
Pylon
and
Storage
fusion
say
so,
and
if
you
want
NO
fusion
say
so
too.
|