| 1 |
Say what??
|
1 |
Say what??
|
| 2 |
\n
|
2 |
\n
|
| 3 |
For starters Warcraft had commanders. It was the precursor of MOBA genre because of it's hero design.
|
3 |
For starters Warcraft had commanders. It was the precursor of MOBA genre because of it's hero design.
|
| 4 |
Starcraft have commanders now too albeit only in cooperation mode. Still a widely loved addition.
|
4 |
Starcraft have commanders now too albeit only in cooperation mode. Still a widely loved addition.
|
| 5 |
It shows that the strong hero figure in the army is a very good strategical concept in RTS games, that's widely used and loved.
|
5 |
It shows that the strong hero figure in the army is a very good strategical concept in RTS games, that's widely used and loved.
|
| 6 |
\n
|
6 |
\n
|
| 7 |
As for irony dripping off of Your comment: my comparison made a lot more sense since Supreme Commander is a part of the same "series" as Zero-K (let's call it TA series for simplicity) while C&C, SC and WC are not. So please, less sarcasm, more constructivity.
|
7 |
As for irony dripping off of Your comment: my comparison made a lot more sense since Supreme Commander is a part of the same "series" as Zero-K (let's call it TA series for simplicity) while C&C, SC and WC are not. So please, less sarcasm, more constructivity.
|
|
|
8 |
\n
|
|
|
9 |
EDIT: Since You edited Your post I will too. I do not follow rule of cool. I follow the rule of usefull. I understand people wanting stronger Commander because I also feel that right now it's just a little better builder. I feel like both having and loosing Commander should be a big deal and not just an ignorable detail. It actually adds risk-reward strategy making to using commander.
|
Can we rebuff coms?