Loading...
  OR  Zero-K Name:    Password:   

Post edit history

Thunderbird Nerf?

To display differences between versions, select one or more edits in the list using checkboxes and click "diff selected"
Post edit history
Date Editor Before After
4/10/2019 7:44:26 AMEErankAdminAnarchid before revert after revert
4/10/2019 7:36:12 AMEErankAdminAnarchid before revert after revert
4/10/2019 7:34:54 AMEErankAdminAnarchid before revert after revert
4/10/2019 7:34:23 AMEErankAdminAnarchid before revert after revert
Before After
1 I have watched that replay and considering TB presence we had equal forces at time of that engagement. The TB strike mainly killed the commander; Dominatrices were enough to finish the rest. Without TB switch i would have had 3 more dominatrices ( 800 factory, 500 thunderbird would have been 1200 into domi) , giving me a less dramatic but still sufficient lead. Additionally, many of the Scorchers were purpose built for that strike; again, a nonexistent TB would have meant even more of the mediocre version. 1 I have watched that replay and considering TB presence we had equal forces at time of that engagement. The TB strike mainly killed the commander; Dominatrices were enough to finish the rest. Without TB switch i would have had 3 more dominatrices ( 800 factory, 500 thunderbird would have been 1200 into domi) , giving me a less dramatic but still sufficient lead. Additionally, many of the Scorchers were purpose built for that strike; again, a nonexistent TB would have meant even more of the mediocre alternative.
2 \n 2 \n
3 If you think a 150% cost in an optimal anti-shield Rover composition should not have won against your shieldball, then, well. That's not a good argument to nerf TB in isolation, but a good one to shine light on rover vs shield. 3 If you think a 150% cost in an optimal anti-shield Rover composition should not have won against your shieldball, then, well. That's not a good argument to nerf TB in isolation, but a good one to shine light on rover vs shield.