| 1 |
[q]They would still have to learn the new prefixes so I don't think it would be that useful.[/q]
|
1 |
[q]They would still have to learn the new prefixes so I don't think it would be that useful.[/q]
|
| 2 |
\n
|
2 |
\n
|
| 3 |
Yeah, I thought someone would say this. The difference is that these two bits of information are mutually reinforcing.
|
3 |
Yeah, I thought someone would say this. The difference is that these two bits of information are mutually reinforcing.
|
| 4 |
\n
|
4 |
\n
|
| 5 |
If I don't know the prefixes but I know what a Scythe is, then seeing CR Scythe will instantly remind me what those prefixes mean.
|
5 |
If I don't know the prefixes but I know what a Scythe is, then seeing CR Scythe will instantly remind me what those prefixes mean.
|
| 6 |
\n
|
6 |
\n
|
| 7 |
\n
|
7 |
\n
|
| 8 |
If I don't know the unit names but I know the prefixes, again, seeing CR Scythe will help me to remember what a Scythe does.
|
8 |
If I don't know the unit names but I know the prefixes, again, seeing CR Scythe will help me to remember what a Scythe does.
|
| 9 |
\n
|
9 |
\n
|
| 10 |
\n
|
10 |
\n
|
| 11 |
I think it's much easier to remember 24 prefixes (especially since you have to know all the factories and roles eventually anyways) than purely to remember 150 unit names.
|
11 |
I think it's much easier to remember 24 prefixes (especially since you have to know all the factories and roles eventually anyways) than purely to remember 150 unit names.
|
| 12 |
\n
|
12 |
\n
|
| 13 |
\n
|
13 |
\n
|
| 14 |
[q]We already have the internal unit names so the prefixes would be at best redundant and at worst become a barrier to communication.[/q]
|
14 |
[q]We already have the internal unit names so the prefixes would be at best redundant and at worst become a barrier to communication.[/q]
|
| 15 |
\n
|
15 |
\n
|
| 16 |
I'm
not
suggesting
that
people
use
the
prefixes
in
conversation
or
discussion.
I'm
suggesting
that
the
full
prefix+name
label
be
used
in
official
documentation.
Wiki,
guides,
information
panels,
etc.
The
internal
unit
names
are
even
worse
as
a
case
of
redundancy
-
they're
a
long,
completely
separate
set
of
names
that
are
not
used
in
any
guides
or
discussions
at
all!
|
16 |
I'm
not
suggesting
that
people
use
the
prefixes
in
conversation
or
discussion.
I'm
suggesting
that
the
full
prefix+name
label
be
used
in
official
documentation.
Wiki,
guides,
information
panels,
etc.
The
internal
unit
names
are
even
worse
as
a
case
of
redundancy
-
they're
a
long,
completely
separate
set
of
names
that
are
not
used
in
any
guides
or
discussions
at
all!
(
jumpsumo?
Only
TA
fans
would
have
a
clue,
for
example.
)
|
| 17 |
\n
|
17 |
\n
|
| 18 |
\n
|
18 |
\n
|
Would unit designation prefixes help new players?