| 1 |
The
current
numerical
state
of
Claymore
dates
from
a
time
when
its
behaviour
was
a
lot
more
janky
and
difficult
to
control
IIRC.
|
1 |
The
current
numerical
state
of
Claymore
dates
from
a
time
when
its
behaviour
was
a
lot
more
janky
and
difficult
to
control
IIRC.
I
believe
it
used
to
kill
itself
a
lot
more.
|
| 2 |
\n
|
2 |
\n
|
| 3 |
At the moment I would consider something along the lines of a cost increase.
|
3 |
At the moment I would consider something along the lines of a cost increase.
|
| 4 |
\n
|
4 |
\n
|
| 5 |
(I also remember somebody abusing the depth charge mechanics to increase effective range or something... did this get fixed? Can anybody provide a reliable means of replication?)
|
5 |
(I also remember somebody abusing the depth charge mechanics to increase effective range or something... did this get fixed? Can anybody provide a reliable means of replication?)
|
Claymore is OP