| 1 |
Oh gosh I remember when Mex and Storage had the same icon. And Pylon and Windgens. Good thing I changed them! \o/
|
1 |
Oh gosh I remember when Mex and Storage had the same icon. And Pylon and Windgens. Good thing I changed them! \o/
|
| 2 |
\n
|
2 |
\n
|
| 3 |
For what it's worth, I always considered Zero-K to have relatively good and useful radar icons. Definitely far better than SupCom's (I couldn't tell any unit icons apart in supcom without looking really close and even then it was hard). They're also neater than S44's - for some reason I really didn't like those.
|
3 |
For what it's worth, I always considered Zero-K to have relatively good and useful radar icons. Definitely far better than SupCom's (I couldn't tell any unit icons apart in supcom without looking really close and even then it was hard). They're also neater than S44's - for some reason I really didn't like those.
|
| 4 |
\n
|
4 |
\n
|
| 5 |
But I do remember that there was room for improvement. Some icons are still shared (how about comm icons, are they still all the same?) and some details are lost (jumpjet symbols were a bit small or lacked contrast iirc). I agree that sometimes the light-dark contrast wasn't perfect, @ShadowWolfTJC. A complete overhaul would be the wrong way to go though, imo. And if it were to happen, then please make sure that they don't look worse and more important that no information gets lost!
|
5 |
But I do remember that there was room for improvement. Some icons are still shared (how about comm icons, are they still all the same?) and some details are lost (jumpjet symbols were a bit small or lacked contrast iirc). I agree that sometimes the light-dark contrast wasn't perfect, @ShadowWolfTJC. A complete overhaul would be the wrong way to go though, imo. And if it were to happen, then please make sure that they don't look worse and more important that no information gets lost!
|
| 6 |
\n
|
6 |
\n
|
| 7 |
@1a zoom out until you see them.
|
7 |
@1a zoom out until you see them.
|
| 8 |
[spoiler]If
I
remember
correct,
default
distance
required
was
always
a
bit
off.
If
you
want
to
adjust
it,
search
for
something
along
the
lines
of
"UnitIconDist"
(
that's
the
name
in
springsettings.
cfg,
no
idea
how
it's
called
in
the
ingame
menu,
but
remember
the
ingame
options
window
has
a
very
useful
SEARCH
button)
.
Personally
I
find
something
near
120
to
be
a
nice
number
(
my
backup
springsettings.
cfg
says
111,
while
my
non-backup
one
says
151)
.
Perhaps
play
around
with
numbers
from
80
to
140
until
you
find
something
you
like.
[/spoiler]
|
8 |
[spoiler]If
I
remember
correct,
default
distance
required
was
always
a
bit
off.
If
you
want
to
adjust
it,
search
for
something
along
the
lines
of
"UnitIconDist"
(
that's
the
name
in
springsettings.
cfg,
no
idea
how
it's
called
in
the
ingame
menu,
but
remember
the
ingame
options
window
has
a
very
useful
SEARCH
button)
.
Personally
I
find
something
near
120
to
be
a
nice
number
(
my
backup
springsettings.
cfg
says
111,
while
my
non-backup
one
says
151)
.
Perhaps
play
around
with
numbers
from
80
to
140
until
you
find
something
you
like.
|
|
|
9 |
\n
|
|
|
10 |
You might have to enable advanced options for this to become adjustable. Also, I think you actually have to be ingame for the option to show up, not sure.[/spoiler]
|
I wish radar icons were easier to discern from eachother.