| 1 |
I wasn't incorrect though, if you can access the data then you can freely find all of it's contents excluding the copyrights and firewalls which maybe intentional obstacles.
|
1 |
I wasn't incorrect though, if you can access the data then you can freely find all of it's contents excluding the copyrights and firewalls which maybe intentional obstacles.
|
| 2 |
https://i62.servimg.com/u/f62/19/11/83/14/3size10.png
|
2 |
https://i62.servimg.com/u/f62/19/11/83/14/3size10.png
|
| 3 |
I also found out that the model you see here is actually another model that's separate to the functional unit.
|
3 |
I also found out that the model you see here is actually another model that's separate to the functional unit.
|
| 4 |
There's no way to find features in a model that doesn't have the data storage features.
|
4 |
There's no way to find features in a model that doesn't have the data storage features.
|
| 5 |
\n
|
5 |
\n
|
| 6 |
If the model was a solid model then nothing further could be done which is why I asked the developers to make a better physiology to player access so one could in mathematical terms change the values like as it is written in the picture in prisms format.
|
6 |
If the model was a solid model then nothing further could be done which is why I asked the developers to make a better physiology to player access so one could in mathematical terms change the values like as it is written in the picture in prisms format.
|
| 7 |
\n
|
7 |
\n
|
| 8 |
I do not type like you nor do I intend to start, your physiology is different to mines. I'm a questioner that does not stop until I find every angle of an equation instead of misunderstand and stumble on parts with the excuse "I do not know how to comprehend", nothing you could find from intelligence but it's simply indicated as just another form of being mentally challenged.
|
8 |
I do not type like you nor do I intend to start, your physiology is different to mines. I'm a questioner that does not stop until I find every angle of an equation instead of misunderstand and stumble on parts with the excuse "I do not know how to comprehend", nothing you could find from intelligence but it's simply indicated as just another form of being mentally challenged.
|
| 9 |
\n
|
9 |
\n
|
| 10 |
https://i.servimg.com/u/f62/19/11/83/14/physic12.png
|
10 |
https://i.servimg.com/u/f62/19/11/83/14/physic12.png
|
| 11 |
As seen on the charts you have the mental disability with the following reading disorders if incapable to understand English words, if you brain failure then this is your own fault not my content but your incapability to understand where there is least needed to comprehend.
|
11 |
As seen on the charts you have the mental disability with the following reading disorders if incapable to understand English words, if you brain failure then this is your own fault not my content but your incapability to understand where there is least needed to comprehend.
|
| 12 |
\n
|
12 |
\n
|
| 13 |
Here's a simple factor that's easy enough for you to understand, now which on my chart are you?
|
13 |
Here's a simple factor that's easy enough for you to understand, now which on my chart are you?
|
| 14 |
https://i.servimg.com/u/f62/19/11/83/14/physic12.png
|
14 |
https://i.servimg.com/u/f62/19/11/83/14/physic12.png
|
| 15 |
You show some signs of both Red or white and your sources don't make up for intelligence.
|
15 |
You show some signs of both Red or white and your sources don't make up for intelligence.
|
| 16 |
\n
|
16 |
\n
|
| 17 |
Here's
your
differences
and
similarities
to
nonsense.
.
|
17 |
Here's
your
differences
and
similarities
to
nonsense.
|
| 18 |
Not
you
=
Capable
of
understanding
-
Content
regardless
of
composition
possible/impossible
or
nonsense/fictional
=
Intelligence
of
every
angel
of
limitless
proportions
|
18 |
'Not
you
='
Capable
of
understanding
-
|
| 19 |
You
=
Incapability
to
understand
+
Content
regardless
of
composition
simple
or
complex
=
Requirement
for
special
needs
for
the
mentally
challenged
|
19 |
Content
regardless
of
composition
possible/impossible
or
nonsense/fictional
=
Intelligence
of
every
angel
of
limitless
proportions
|
|
|
20 |
\n
|
|
|
21 |
'You =' Incapability to understand + Content regardless of composition simple or complex = Requirement for special needs for the mentally challenged
|
| 20 |
\n
|
22 |
\n
|
| 21 |
Your flaw is not your knowledge of fewer factors but your bad compositions. If your mind = nonsense then nonsense is all your mind can comprehend that's easily understandable. I find it impossible to misunderstand anything unless you're mentally challenged. You work in limited angels while I don't, that's the differences.
|
23 |
Your flaw is not your knowledge of fewer factors but your bad compositions. If your mind = nonsense then nonsense is all your mind can comprehend that's easily understandable. I find it impossible to misunderstand anything unless you're mentally challenged. You work in limited angels while I don't, that's the differences.
|
| 22 |
\n
|
24 |
\n
|
| 23 |
And the result is, if you were the upholder of any known physiology then your errors are known to any serious counter parting competitor. In other words, earth is doomed if your format was known physics found extra to correct formats of working physics. I know you're too good to know anything but in emergencies I'm certain you can be very resourceful.
|
25 |
And the result is, if you were the upholder of any known physiology then your errors are known to any serious counter parting competitor. In other words, earth is doomed if your format was known physics found extra to correct formats of working physics. I know you're too good to know anything but in emergencies I'm certain you can be very resourceful.
|
| 24 |
\n
|
26 |
\n
|
| 25 |
I find it unthinkable to insult a Factor with existing meaning, you may even find out that the words that are used exist in your dictionary, and that if you were to place your format in microsoft word then it would have corrected your compositions. This program is known for corrections in all angels regardless of which version it is, that is if you know how to use it.
|
27 |
I find it unthinkable to insult a Factor with existing meaning, you may even find out that the words that are used exist in your dictionary, and that if you were to place your format in microsoft word then it would have corrected your compositions. This program is known for corrections in all angels regardless of which version it is, that is if you know how to use it.
|
| 26 |
\n
|
28 |
\n
|
| 27 |
@SmokeDragon
|
29 |
@SmokeDragon
|
| 28 |
And by the way, the science that I use is too accurate for you to make a correction, by simply repeating the same thing you have only proven that it has a fair maximized amount of flawlessness.
|
30 |
And by the way, the science that I use is too accurate for you to make a correction, by simply repeating the same thing you have only proven that it has a fair maximized amount of flawlessness.
|
| 29 |
\n
|
31 |
\n
|
| 30 |
What if I challenged you into a science game, you make an invention that you think could beat anything but with an explanation of it's sciences otherwise it won't take any effect would you accept it? This request is so that you get pondered in a field where you aren't intelligent, you only get 1000 inventions but you can't be inspired by any without encountering them. I know you have a limit to your angels so you couldn't nearly surpass me anyway. I'll call it, the science storm and I can assume you know how to play it, simply make something better than anyone else and win, the losers do not have any say whether their intelligent or not, that's for the victor's choice. Actually all I was asking you was to repeat the process of knowing the existing component factors.
|
32 |
What if I challenged you into a science game, you make an invention that you think could beat anything but with an explanation of it's sciences otherwise it won't take any effect would you accept it? This request is so that you get pondered in a field where you aren't intelligent, you only get 1000 inventions but you can't be inspired by any without encountering them. I know you have a limit to your angels so you couldn't nearly surpass me anyway. I'll call it, the science storm and I can assume you know how to play it, simply make something better than anyone else and win, the losers do not have any say whether their intelligent or not, that's for the victor's choice. Actually all I was asking you was to repeat the process of knowing the existing component factors.
|
| 31 |
\n
|
33 |
\n
|
| 32 |
https://zero-k.info/Forum/Thread/24945?postID=182071
|
34 |
https://zero-k.info/Forum/Thread/24945?postID=182071
|
| 33 |
Also I find it very insecure and unintelligent to use singular angler beliefs like you do with your limited understanding of complex or simple factors that you find in the zero-k category.
|
35 |
Also I find it very insecure and unintelligent to use singular angler beliefs like you do with your limited understanding of complex or simple factors that you find in the zero-k category.
|
Zero-k finding further complexities for players to use?