| 1 |
@BigMac That is a perfect example of why you shouldn't rely on in-game statistics for a rating system. I've played the game as "unicorn" and "tomato" while keeping the same win rate. Such a system might be helpful if you want to determine a player's play style, but not to balance teams.
|
1 |
@BigMac That is a perfect example of why you shouldn't rely on in-game statistics for a rating system. I've played the game as "unicorn" and "tomato" while keeping the same win rate. Such a system might be helpful if you want to determine a player's play style, but not to balance teams.
|
| 2 |
\n
|
2 |
\n
|
| 3 |
I
wouldn't
want
to
officially
encourage
behaviour
as
you
get
it
with
wn-rating
in
zero-k.
The
awards
are
already
going
in
this
direction,
no
need
to
encourage
stat-padding
any
more
than
that.
|
3 |
I
wouldn't
want
to
officially
encourage
behaviour
as
you
get
it
with
wn-rating
in
zero-k.
The
awards
are
already
going
in
this
direction.
There's
no
need
to
encourage
stat-padding
any
more
than
that.
|
| 4 |
\n
|
4 |
\n
|
| 5 |
It seems like standard deviation might be a good thing to try.
|
5 |
It seems like standard deviation might be a good thing to try.
|
Calculating team skill