Loading...
  OR  Zero-K Name:    Password:   

Post edit history

Intended way to Play?

To display differences between versions, select one or more edits in the list using checkboxes and click "diff selected"
Post edit history
Date Editor Before After
10/6/2017 3:24:07 AMRUrankFirepluk before revert after revert
10/6/2017 3:23:10 AMRUrankFirepluk before revert after revert
10/6/2017 3:20:35 AMRUrankFirepluk before revert after revert
Before After
1 it really depends, in big team games more passive play style can be acceptable and even beneficial, 1 it really depends, in big team games more passive play style can be acceptable and even beneficial,
2 but in smaller team games or in 1v1 passive play style will most certainly be the direct reason of you loss 2 but in smaller team games or in 1v1 passive play style will most certainly be the direct reason of you loss
3 \n 3 \n
4 you need to fight for metal && map control - those directly fuel your victory 4 you need to fight for metal && map control - those directly fuel your victory
5 also there is wise words - don't make your economy grow faster than your enemy's, make their grow slower 5 also there is wise words - don't make your economy grow faster than your enemy's, make their grow slower
6 i.e. raid the shit out of it 6 i.e. raid the shit out of it
7 \n 7 \n
8 aggresive play style often dictates conditions and trade offs for your enemies and makes the game more controllable for you, 8 aggresive play style often dictates conditions and trade offs for your enemies and makes the game more controllable for you,
9 because you choose when and on which conditions in which amounts and where your units will have to die xD 9 because you choose when, where, on which conditions and in which amounts your units will have to die xD