| 1 |
it really depends, in big team games more passive play style can be acceptable and even beneficial,
|
1 |
it really depends, in big team games more passive play style can be acceptable and even beneficial,
|
| 2 |
but in smaller team games or in 1v1 passive play style will most certainly be the direct reason of you loss
|
2 |
but in smaller team games or in 1v1 passive play style will most certainly be the direct reason of you loss
|
| 3 |
\n
|
3 |
\n
|
| 4 |
you need to fight for metal && map control - those directly fuel your victory
|
4 |
you need to fight for metal && map control - those directly fuel your victory
|
| 5 |
also there is wise words - don't make your economy grow faster than your enemy's, make their grow slower
|
5 |
also there is wise words - don't make your economy grow faster than your enemy's, make their grow slower
|
| 6 |
i.e. raid the shit out of it
|
6 |
i.e. raid the shit out of it
|
| 7 |
\n
|
7 |
\n
|
| 8 |
aggresive play style often dictates conditions and trade offs for your enemies and makes the game more controllable for you,
|
8 |
aggresive play style often dictates conditions and trade offs for your enemies and makes the game more controllable for you,
|
| 9 |
because
you
choose
when
and
on
which
conditions
in
which
amounts
and
where
your
units
will
have
to
die
xD
|
9 |
because
you
choose
when,
where,
on
which
conditions
and
in
which
amounts
your
units
will
have
to
die
xD
|
Intended way to Play?