1 |
Okay, my time is being wasted now. Dancer, either modify your behaviour or I imagine you're likely to get modactioned again.
|
1 |
Okay, my time is being wasted now. Dancer, either modify your behaviour or I imagine you're likely to get modactioned again.
|
2 |
\n
|
2 |
\n
|
3 |
I don't care about about your long-winded explanations because whatever happened in the game is completely irrelevant to whether anything you said was appropriate. I watched the game and drew my own conclusions.
|
3 |
I don't care about about your long-winded explanations because whatever happened in the game is completely irrelevant to whether anything you said was appropriate. I watched the game and drew my own conclusions.
|
4 |
\n
|
4 |
\n
|
5 |
If you seriously think that other players in this game broke the CoC, I advise you to take it up with another moderator. If you're just using it as a smokescreen for "they did it so I can do it too", that's an invalid argument anyway.
|
5 |
If you seriously think that other players in this game broke the CoC, I advise you to take it up with another moderator. If you're just using it as a smokescreen for "they did it so I can do it too", that's an invalid argument anyway.
|
6 |
\n
|
6 |
\n
|
7 |
[spoiler]
|
7 |
[spoiler]
|
8 |
[quote]Ally goes "all in" with literally (yes LITERALLY) all of his combat units. so if thats not all in, im not sure what is? [/quote]
|
8 |
[quote]Ally goes "all in" with literally (yes LITERALLY) all of his combat units. so if thats not all in, im not sure what is? [/quote]
|
9 |
An "all in" would be staking the outcome of the entire game on a single attack. I don't think this satisfies that requirement.
|
9 |
An "all in" would be staking the outcome of the entire game on a single attack. I don't think this satisfies that requirement.
|
10 |
\n
|
10 |
\n
|
11 |
[quote]Funny thing is... after i said "fuck you" the player ACTUALLY began to communicate with his allies, talking about tactics and such.[/quote]
|
11 |
[quote]Funny thing is... after i said "fuck you" the player ACTUALLY began to communicate with his allies, talking about tactics and such.[/quote]
|
12 |
Pyro had time to talk because he resigned. You didn't magically make it happen by abusing him.
|
12 |
Pyro had time to talk because he resigned. You didn't magically make it happen by abusing him.
|
13 |
\n
|
13 |
\n
|
14 |
[quote]
|
14 |
[quote]
|
15 |
Then why did Hokomoko penalize me after the game, and not say a damned thing during the game? [/quote]
|
15 |
Then why did Hokomoko penalize me after the game, and not say a damned thing during the game? [/quote]
|
16 |
Oh I don't know, maybe because he was [b]PLAYING A GAME OF ZERO-K[/b]?
|
16 |
Oh I don't know, maybe because he was [b]PLAYING A GAME OF ZERO-K[/b]?
|
17 |
\n
|
17 |
\n
|
|
|
18 |
[quote]Interesting there has been no paste bin about post game discussion.[/quote]
|
|
|
19 |
You're the only one dissatisfied with the current state of affairs, so the fact that you haven't produced one to substantiate your point of view is indeed very interesting.
|
|
|
20 |
\n
|
18 |
If you're going to make pointless arguments about something irrelevant to the reason you were muted, they could at least be good arguments.
|
21 |
If you're going to make pointless arguments about something irrelevant to the reason you were muted, they could at least be good arguments.
|
19 |
\n
|
22 |
\n
|
20 |
A player on your team playing poorly and/or not responding promptly to chat is under no cirucmstances an adeuqate reason to abuse them. If they're griefing, then kick them. If they're playing poorly, either ignore them or [i]politely[/i] advise them how to improve their game.
|
23 |
A player on your team playing poorly and/or not responding promptly to chat is under no cirucmstances an adeuqate reason to abuse them. If they're griefing, then kick them. If they're playing poorly, either ignore them or [i]politely[/i] advise them how to improve their game.
|
21 |
[/spoiler]
|
24 |
[/spoiler]
|