| 1 |
@GoogleFrog
|
1 |
@GoogleFrog
|
| 2 |
\n
|
2 |
\n
|
| 3 |
Yes, I consider it as team of one.
|
3 |
Yes, I consider it as team of one.
|
| 4 |
\n
|
4 |
\n
|
| 5 |
I would also fix the tie breaker to a time extension of 15 mins
|
5 |
I would also fix the tie breaker to a time extension of 15 mins
|
| 6 |
\n
|
6 |
\n
|
| 7 |
\n
|
7 |
\n
|
| 8 |
\n
|
8 |
\n
|
| 9 |
[quote]Win or lost decision will be what both teams agree on.[/quote]
|
9 |
[quote]Win or lost decision will be what both teams agree on.[/quote]
|
| 10 |
\n
|
10 |
\n
|
| 11 |
It means that in the event that both teams agree on something, they can overrule matches' outcome. It aims to promote autonomy and sportsmanlike behavior [i.e. a player on team A got disconnect by accident. Team B won the match but may choose to forfeit or call a draw, which we will accept]. Mind, even if one player disagrees, the arbitrator would step in and decide.I don't think it would be used much
|
11 |
It means that in the event that both teams agree on something, they can overrule matches' outcome. It aims to promote autonomy and sportsmanlike behavior [i.e. a player on team A got disconnect by accident. Team B won the match but may choose to forfeit or call a draw, which we will accept]. Mind, even if one player disagrees, the arbitrator would step in and decide.I don't think it would be used much
|
| 12 |
\n
|
12 |
\n
|
| 13 |
I
will
change
the
map
list
as
suggested
|
13 |
I
will
change
the
map
list
as
suggested.
Further
recommendations
are
welcome.
|
|
|
14 |
\n
|
|
|
15 |
Current players list:
|
|
|
16 |
\n
|
|
|
17 |
@DeinFreund
|
|
|
18 |
@Capricis
|
|
|
19 |
@Orfelius
|
|
|
20 |
@dahn
|
|
|
21 |
@exploit
|
|
|
22 |
@[DK]Krudor
|
|
|
23 |
\n
|
|
|
24 |
Maybe participating list:
|
|
|
25 |
@KingRaptor
|
|
|
26 |
@Rebel0
|
|
|
27 |
@Fealthas
|
|
|
28 |
@Aquanim
|
Zero-K 1v1 Tournament 4th of June 2016