| 1 |
Skasi hasn't expressed it very clearly (it is buried in the post a bit) but the idea is not to use pure Dart, or indeed even mostly Dart as your army.
|
1 |
Skasi hasn't expressed it very clearly (it is buried in the post a bit) but the idea is not to use pure Dart, or indeed even mostly Dart as your army.
|
| 2 |
\n
|
2 |
\n
|
| 3 |
The purpose behind mixing in some Darts is:
|
3 |
The purpose behind mixing in some Darts is:
|
| 4 |
\n
|
4 |
\n
|
| 5 |
- Cheap scouting
|
5 |
- Cheap scouting
|
| 6 |
- Raiding mex
|
6 |
- Raiding mex
|
| 7 |
- Ablative shield for your other units
|
7 |
- Ablative shield for your other units
|
| 8 |
\n
|
8 |
\n
|
| 9 |
In
most
matchups
Scorcher
fills
those
roles
well
enough
(
though
especially
for
scouting
Dart
is
always
useful
early)
,
but
against
Daggers
the
Scorcher
has
a
poor
matchup
and
does
not
do
so
well.
|
9 |
In
most
matchups
Scorcher
fills
those
roles
well
enough
(
though
especially
for
scouting
Dart
is
always
useful
early)
,
but
against
Daggers
(
and
Scalpels)
the
Scorcher
has
a
poor
matchup
and
does
not
do
so
well.
|
|
|
10 |
\n
|
|
|
11 |
(Incidentally pure Dart does beat a reasonable number of Scalpels and is hard for Halberds to kill, IIRC. If you can kill your opponents' Maces, or if they neglected to make any, Hover is left without a way to kill many Darts quickly.)
|
| 10 |
\n
|
12 |
\n
|
| 11 |
You should not build no Scorchers (it is your best answer to Halberds I think, and if you can get them past the Daggers they are still your best raider) but in comparison to most other matchups they are far less useful.
|
13 |
You should not build no Scorchers (it is your best answer to Halberds I think, and if you can get them past the Daggers they are still your best raider) but in comparison to most other matchups they are far less useful.
|
B414359 2 on TitanDuel (Multiplayer)