1 |
[quote]you are completely ignoring fact I was completely wrong about eco, proving me right, and proving you wrong. I mentioned this fact in the forum topic.[/quote]
|
1 |
[quote]you are completely ignoring fact I was completely wrong about eco, proving me right, and proving you wrong. I mentioned this fact in the forum topic.[/quote]
|
2 |
\n
|
2 |
\n
|
3 |
You're still caught up on rationalizing it based on this? You gave away intel (even if it is false) that players on either side [u]don't[/u] have access to and caused your winning team to resign. This is what @Chesti was talking about and in fact, if you want the reasoning behind it is because by allowing a fringe speccheat thing to go will lead to more fringe speccheats which will eventually lead to full blown speccheats.
|
3 |
You're still caught up on rationalizing it based on this? You gave away intel (even if it is false) that players on either side [u]don't[/u] have access to and caused your winning team to resign. This is what @Chesti was talking about and in fact, if you want the reasoning behind it is because by allowing a fringe speccheat thing to go will lead to more fringe speccheats which will eventually lead to full blown speccheats.
|
4 |
\n
|
4 |
\n
|
5 |
You
may
be
right
on
the
information
was
wrong,
but
you
still
had
an
influence
on
the
decision
making
of
the
team
as
a
spectator
(
it
is
known
that
spectators
have
full
access
to
the
information
=
assumed
trust
=
resign
time)
.
|
5 |
You
may
be
right
on
the
information
was
wrong,
but
you
still
had
an
influence
on
the
decision
making
of
the
team
as
a
spectator
(
it
is
known
that
spectators
have
full
access
to
the
information
->
assumed
trust
=
resign
time)
.
|