Loading...
  OR  Zero-K Name:    Password:   

Post edit history

Current meta not much fun

To display differences between versions, select one or more edits in the list using checkboxes and click "diff selected"
Post edit history
Date Editor Before After
2/26/2016 2:33:49 PMAUrankAdminAquanim before revert after revert
2/26/2016 2:33:24 PMAUrankAdminAquanim before revert after revert
2/26/2016 2:33:05 PMAUrankAdminAquanim before revert after revert
2/26/2016 2:28:34 PMAUrankAdminAquanim before revert after revert
Before After
1 My opinion based on a small number of games is that both Valkyrie and Warrior could do with a small-to-moderate application of the nerfbat. 1 My opinion based on a small number of games is that both Valkyrie and Warrior could do with a small-to-moderate application of the nerfbat.
2 \n 2 \n
3 I like that Warrior gives Cloaky a mid-game army that is respectable. I don't like that it takes a gigantic flaming dump on Ravager ( among many other things) . It could have less range, and possibly a nerf somewhere else too ( damage, perhaps) . I kind of like it having some autoheal but the present numbers are likely overkill too. 3 I like that Warrior gives Cloaky a mid-game army that is respectable. I don't like that it takes a gigantic flaming dump on Ravager ( among many other things) . It could have a bit less range and damage. I kind of like it having some autoheal but the present numbers are likely overkill too.
4 \n 4 \n
5 Valkyrie could also use some nerfing IMO. Scallop drop and the blind RPS with start positions has always been a problem. 5 Valkyrie could also use some nerfing IMO. Scallop drop and the blind RPS with start positions has always been a problem.