Loading...
  OR  Zero-K Name:    Password:   

Post edit history

Psychology of Zero-K

To display differences between versions, select one or more edits in the list using checkboxes and click "diff selected"
Post edit history
Date Editor Before After
2/24/2016 1:02:46 PMPLrankOrfelius before revert after revert
2/24/2016 1:01:51 PMPLrankOrfelius before revert after revert
2/24/2016 12:49:15 PMPLrankOrfelius before revert after revert
2/24/2016 12:48:56 PMPLrankOrfelius before revert after revert
2/24/2016 12:48:45 PMPLrankOrfelius before revert after revert
Before After
1 [q]Someone said smurfing was trolling, this is ridiculous, the terms are clearly defined and they do not overlap.[/q]
2 They might as well can. Smurfing is a behaviour that resolves around making new accounts despite having one already. If you play with this account you have elo that is not accountible to your skill level. As such smurfs skew the balance of teams and makes people angry thus people hate when others do it. Which comes ecactly into the definition of trolling you provided. You aggrivate others by not doing a socially acceptable thing.
3 1. Consensus is that smurfing is not acceptable if you play with such smurf.
4 2. Apparently the offender did not agree with the consensus since they chose to disregard it.
5 3. Depends on the case, but the effect matters more than the motivation itself. For example Anteep does it on a base of aggrivating others but Sfireman done it to get rid of his elo. Effects of both were somewhat comparable.
6 \n
1 [q]You can't ban everyone for saying something negative, so lets allow some undesirable social consequences to be directed at the "What you did in that last game was so fucking stupid i hope you die" parade.[/q] 7 [q]You can't ban everyone for saying something negative, so lets allow some undesirable social consequences to be directed at the "What you did in that last game was so fucking stupid i hope you die" parade.[/q]
2 Technically they can. Here is an excerpt from the CoC: 8 Technically they can. Here is an excerpt from the CoC:
3 [q]0. Don't make the game better off without your presence[/q] 9 [q]0. Don't make the game better off without your presence[/q]
4 In fact i know one particular instance when saying something negative was punished on that basis. 10 In fact i know one particular instance when saying something negative was punished on that basis.
5 \n 11 \n
6 [img]http://i.imgur.com/WtD3ZmC.png[/img] 12 [img]http://i.imgur.com/WtD3ZmC.png[/img]
7 \n 13 \n
8 So you better watch out what you are saying. 14 So you better watch out what you are saying.
9 \n
10 [q]Someone said smurfing was trolling, this is ridiculous, the terms are clearly defined and they do not overlap.[/q]
11 They might as well can. Smurfing is a behaviour that resolves around making new accounts despite having one already. If you play with this account you have elo that is not accountible to your skill level. As such smurfs skew the balance of teams and makes people angry thus people hate when others do it. Which comes ecactly into the definition of trolling you provided. You aggrivate others by not doing a socially acceptable thing.
12 1. Consensus is that smurfing is not acceptable if you play with such smurf.
13 2. Apparently the offender did not agree with the consensus since they chose to disregard it.
14 3. Depends on the case, but the effect matters more than the motivation itself. For example Anteep does it on a base of aggrivating others but Sfireman done it to get rid of his elo. Effects of both were somewhat comparable.