| 1 |
Talked to @Sprung and he told me that even if my ideas are ok in some kind of perspective, they lack the reasoning behind it. Weird fact is that a long time ago some of my ideas got implemented by time. Example
|
1 |
Talked to @Sprung and he told me that even if my ideas are ok in some kind of perspective, they lack the reasoning behind it. Weird fact is that a long time ago some of my ideas got implemented by time. Example
|
| 2 |
\n
|
2 |
\n
|
| 3 |
I talked in the zk lobby dev channel about DROP CARGO FEATURE, and from what I remember I got totally ignored.
|
3 |
I talked in the zk lobby dev channel about DROP CARGO FEATURE, and from what I remember I got totally ignored.
|
| 4 |
Thread proof : http://zero-k.info/Forum/Thread/3431
|
4 |
Thread proof : http://zero-k.info/Forum/Thread/3431
|
| 5 |
\n
|
5 |
\n
|
| 6 |
I talked about more modules for commanders and more complexity and now it got implemented in some way...
|
6 |
I talked about more modules for commanders and more complexity and now it got implemented in some way...
|
| 7 |
I tried to find the thread made by me, but clearly I posted on threads made by other people and it will take a lot of time to gain some proof.
|
7 |
I tried to find the thread made by me, but clearly I posted on threads made by other people and it will take a lot of time to gain some proof.
|
| 8 |
\n
|
8 |
\n
|
| 9 |
I talked about specific modules for chassis of commanders that are in a way implemented:
|
9 |
I talked about specific modules for chassis of commanders that are in a way implemented:
|
| 10 |
http://zero-k.info/Forum/Thread/7527
|
10 |
http://zero-k.info/Forum/Thread/7527
|
| 11 |
\n
|
11 |
\n
|
| 12 |
I don't want to brag or something, it's just that I always knew that making commanders more complex for this game will bring more depth for it. And now I started to talk about [spoiler][quote]And is that a bad thing? Already commanders with full modules have 30 k metal cost, A detriment is 22 K. I think detriment wins overall even if the commander is with a d gun.
|
12 |
I don't want to brag or something, it's just that I always knew that making commanders more complex for this game will bring more depth for it. And now I started to talk about [spoiler][quote]And is that a bad thing? Already commanders with full modules have 30 k metal cost, A detriment is 22 K. I think detriment wins overall even if the commander is with a d gun.
|
| 13 |
\n
|
13 |
\n
|
| 14 |
I think we need to make modules a bit cheaper in metal cost and then give infinite amount of modules to unlock ( to the specific modules that stacks of course). The more modules you want the more experience points you need to unlock them...
|
14 |
I think we need to make modules a bit cheaper in metal cost and then give infinite amount of modules to unlock ( to the specific modules that stacks of course). The more modules you want the more experience points you need to unlock them...
|
| 15 |
\n
|
15 |
\n
|
| 16 |
\n
|
16 |
\n
|
| 17 |
Also modules like these down here will bring flavor to the game:
|
17 |
Also modules like these down here will bring flavor to the game:
|
| 18 |
\n
|
18 |
\n
|
| 19 |
Faster attack speed for weapons
|
19 |
Faster attack speed for weapons
|
| 20 |
Faster reload speed for d guns
|
20 |
Faster reload speed for d guns
|
| 21 |
Faster cloaking/uncloaking rate
|
21 |
Faster cloaking/uncloaking rate
|
| 22 |
Smaller decloak range
|
22 |
Smaller decloak range
|
| 23 |
Line of sight increase
|
23 |
Line of sight increase
|
| 24 |
Motion sensor( makes your commander detect cloaking enemy, more of these modules you chosen the more range)
|
24 |
Motion sensor( makes your commander detect cloaking enemy, more of these modules you chosen the more range)
|
| 25 |
Advance Radar
|
25 |
Advance Radar
|
| 26 |
Faster jump rate
|
26 |
Faster jump rate
|
| 27 |
Faster shield regeneration rate
|
27 |
Faster shield regeneration rate
|
| 28 |
And
more
[quote][/spoiler]
|
28 |
And
more
[/quote][/spoiler]
|
| 29 |
\n
|
29 |
\n
|
| 30 |
And still negative thinking regarding these ideas. Forgot to mention the Transformer commanders thing that i talked about...
|
30 |
And still negative thinking regarding these ideas. Forgot to mention the Transformer commanders thing that i talked about...
|
| 31 |
\n
|
31 |
\n
|
| 32 |
My point is that I just wanted for you guys to have a better game, and please forgive me that I don't know how to explain the depth changes the game will have in case some of my ideas get implemented. At least some of the big things that I talked over and over again on threads and lobby are here now. Hope you guys will implement some more.
|
32 |
My point is that I just wanted for you guys to have a better game, and please forgive me that I don't know how to explain the depth changes the game will have in case some of my ideas get implemented. At least some of the big things that I talked over and over again on threads and lobby are here now. Hope you guys will implement some more.
|
| 33 |
\n
|
33 |
\n
|
| 34 |
\n
|
34 |
\n
|
The reasoning behind my "silly ideas"