1 |
[quote]Potentially it could be given a new kind of (non-charge transfering) shield like a deflection shield, dampening fields etc with meaningfully different behaviour which doesn't have the shield-charge-sharing mechanic.[/quote]
|
1 |
[quote]Potentially it could be given a new kind of (non-charge transfering) shield like a deflection shield, dampening fields etc with meaningfully different behaviour which doesn't have the shield-charge-sharing mechanic.[/quote]
|
2 |
\n
|
2 |
\n
|
3 |
See chickens, they already have that type of shield implemented.
|
3 |
See chickens, they already have that type of shield implemented.
|
4 |
\n
|
4 |
\n
|
5 |
I'd be ok with funnelweb having a chicken-shield and an aegis shield, both at once. At least until it shows itself as being op.
|
5 |
I'd be ok with funnelweb having a chicken-shield and an aegis shield, both at once. At least until it shows itself as being op.
|
|
|
6 |
\n
|
|
|
7 |
[quote]Repositioning. Ability to teleport your army like with Djinn or to do a small teleport jump forward or back taking ally units with it (This is a bit like an easy, instantaneous transport: The distance can be the shield radius for easy judgement). Maybe even offensive use: Get close to an enemy and then flash backwards, isolating it and bringing it into your army.[/quote]
|
|
|
8 |
\n
|
|
|
9 |
No, too crazy for zk. That belongs in Red Alert series, with the Chronosphere superweapon.
|
|
|
10 |
\n
|
|
|
11 |
[quote]Construction capacity. Repair, reclaim, or full constructor status.[/quote]
|
|
|
12 |
\n
|
|
|
13 |
No, GF and Sprung and others have heavily agreed that it would cause some pain and be a general bad idea if a strider were also be recognized as a builder unit by giving it a nano-weapon.
|