| 1 |
As of right now, the Reaper from the Heavy Tank Factory is classed as an Assault Tank: http://zero-k.info/Static/UnitGuide#unit-Reaper
|
1 |
As of right now, the Reaper from the Heavy Tank Factory is classed as an Assault Tank: http://zero-k.info/Static/UnitGuide#unit-Reaper
|
| 2 |
\n
|
2 |
\n
|
| 3 |
I
suggest
it
be
re-classed
as
a
Main
Battle
Tank.
A
good
ol'
MBT
just
sounds
a
_hell_
of
a
lot
smoother,
more
intimidating,
and
all
around
badass.
|
3 |
I
suggest
it
be
re-classed
as
a
Main
Battle
Tank.
A
good
ol'
MBT
just
sounds
a
[i]hell[/i]
of
a
lot
smoother,
more
intimidating,
and
all
around
badass.
|
| 4 |
\n
|
4 |
\n
|
| 5 |
The moniker 'Assault Tank' is just forgettable. It's already obvious that the Reaper is an Assault-class unit to begin with!
|
5 |
The moniker 'Assault Tank' is just forgettable. It's already obvious that the Reaper is an Assault-class unit to begin with!
|
| 6 |
\n
|
6 |
\n
|
| 7 |
Thus,
a
much
clearer
definition
of
its
role
would
be
Main
Battle
Tank,
as
that
is
precisely
what
it
is
--
a
unit
designed
for
the
frontline,
that
can
both
take
large
amounts
of
punishment
and
give
plenty
of
it
back
with
its
deadly
cannons.
MBT's
have
been
the
mainstay
of
player
armies
in
almost
every
RTS
to
date.
Why
not
call
the
Reaper
for
what
it
is,
rather
than
something
boring
and
unremarkable?
|
7 |
Thus,
a
much
clearer
definition
of
its
role
would
be
Main
Battle
Tank,
as
that
is
precisely
what
it
is
--
a
unit
designed
for
the
frontline,
that
can
both
take
large
amounts
of
punishment
and
give
plenty
of
it
back
with
its
deadly
cannons.
MBT's
have
been
the
mainstay
of
player
armies
in
almost
every
RTS
to
date.
Why
not
call
the
Reaper
what
it
is,
rather
than
something
boring
and
unremarkable?
|
Re-class the Reaper tank