Loading...
  OR  Zero-K Name:    Password:   

Post edit history

Swift vs. Hawk

To display differences between versions, select one or more edits in the list using checkboxes and click "diff selected"
Post edit history
Date Editor Before After
9/14/2015 2:51:44 PMPLrankOrfelius before revert after revert
9/14/2015 2:48:45 PMPLrankOrfelius before revert after revert
Before After
1 How about: 1 How about:
2 Reduce speed of swift's boost but make it last a bit longer. 2 Reduce speed of swift's boost but make it last a bit longer.
3 Give swift AA missile only. 3 Give swift AA missile only.
4 Give hawk heavy laser bolts that are not 100% hit and able to shoot ground. Also give them AA missile that gives them ability to shoot back at swifts. 4 Give hawk heavy laser bolts that are not 100% hit and able to shoot ground. Also give them AA missile that gives them ability to shoot back at swifts.
5 \n 5 \n
6 Idea is to have a heavy fighter that is able to strafe ground and is slower and less agile than interceptor, that is swift. It would soft counter bombers and fast gunships (with missiles) and hard counter slow gunships such as krow, rapier and trident. With slowed swift boost tridents and rapiers would have much easier time killing swifts. 6 Idea is to have a heavy fighter that is able to strafe ground and is slower and less agile than interceptor, that is swift. It would soft counter bombers and fast gunships (with missiles) and hard counter slow gunships such as krow, rapier and trident. With slowed swift boost tridents and rapiers would have much easier time killing swifts.
7 \n 7 \n
8 Now onto comments: 8 Now onto comments:
9 Giving speed boost to hawk is pointless since it could be only used to escape/chase but during toe to toe fight it would not gain anything. Swift on the other hand would be rendered useless because of this. 9 Giving speed boost to hawk is pointless since it could be only used to escape/chase but during toe to toe fight it would not gain anything. Swift on the other hand would be rendered useless because of this.
10 \n 10 \n
11 Air cloak is a no no and radar invisibility serves does not provide any interesting interactions anyway so in my book it might as well be removed. 11 Air cloak is a no no and radar invisibility serves does not provide any interesting interactions anyway so in my book it might as well be removed.
12 \n
13 Tractor beams are interesting but grav beam is a very finnicky at times.