1 |
[quote]I too am hesitant to relive the slaughter of panther vs. glaive. I was too bad to reliably gauge their power at the time, but I remember using panthers to make ridiculous cost in big teams vs. both glaives and scorchers. This revert would further disincentivise bots near flats. [/quote]
|
1 |
[quote]I too am hesitant to relive the slaughter of panther vs. glaive. I was too bad to reliably gauge their power at the time, but I remember using panthers to make ridiculous cost in big teams vs. both glaives and scorchers. This revert would further disincentivise bots near flats. [/quote]
|
2 |
\n
|
2 |
\n
|
3 |
is it really a problem if the 300 metal raider beats the 65 metal raider (in direct combat, not at actual raider buisness) - for the price of sitting around on its 300 metal ass being useless as soon as enemy switches out of raiders?
|
3 |
is it really a problem if the 300 metal raider beats the 65 metal raider (in direct combat, not at actual raider buisness) - for the price of sitting around on its 300 metal ass being useless as soon as enemy switches out of raiders?
|
4 |
\n
|
4 |
\n
|
5 |
\n
|
5 |
\n
|
6 |
panthers' only job is to counter other raiders, they can also with high micro effort kill the occasional stray reaper etc. thats it. i am fairly sure that it does not counter "the whole cloakie fac", in fact, it probably counters nothing except glaives and rockos/hammers.
|
6 |
panthers' only job is to counter other raiders, they can also with high micro effort kill the occasional stray reaper etc. thats it. i am fairly sure that it does not counter "the whole cloakie fac", in fact, it probably counters nothing except glaives and rockos/hammers.
|
7 |
\n
|
7 |
\n
|
8 |
(
if
you
micro
them
all
the
time
because
you
need
to
kill
4
rockos
to
make
cost
and
you
need
3
shots
for
each.
)
|
8 |
(
if
you
micro
them
all
the
time
because
you
need
to
kill
4
rockos
to
make
cost
and
you
need
3
shots
for
each.
if
you
face
any
serious
amount
of
rockos
they
are
at
an
advantage.
)
|