1 |
[quote]You keep saying that big games are bad, but all i see is your personal opinion.[/quote]
|
1 |
[quote]You keep saying that big games are bad, but all i see is your personal opinion.[/quote]
|
2 |
Larger games:
|
2 |
Larger games:
|
3 |
* have higher Elo variance.
|
3 |
* have higher Elo variance.
|
4 |
* make the already performance-hungry game even more so.
|
4 |
* make the already performance-hungry game even more so.
|
5 |
* take more time to start (lobby voting).
|
5 |
* take more time to start (lobby voting).
|
6 |
* are preferred by trolls and make them effective for cost (one troll ruins game for more people).
|
6 |
* are preferred by trolls and make them effective for cost (one troll ruins game for more people).
|
7 |
* unit balance deviates more (most units are balanced for 1v1).
|
7 |
* unit balance deviates more (most units are balanced for 1v1).
|
8 |
* cannot be handled by the colour spectrum (hard to tell people's colors apart).
|
8 |
* cannot be handled by the colour spectrum (hard to tell people's colors apart).
|
9 |
\n
|
9 |
\n
|
|
|
10 |
They harm development:
|
|
|
11 |
* it puts constraints on what can be done. Smaller games can't have nice things if they don't scale.
|
|
|
12 |
* testing properly becomes difficult. Some bugs only really happen in dense games and getting 20 people to join a testing room on their own volition (like they would a regular room) is not easy.
|
|
|
13 |
\n
|
10 |
Then there's personal dislike reasons:
|
14 |
Then there's personal dislike reasons:
|
11 |
* incentivize passive playstyle due to the ease of porc and eco, and are thus usually either a cheezy rush or a porcfest.
|
15 |
* incentivize passive playstyle due to the ease of porc and eco, and are thus usually either a cheezy rush or a porcfest.
|
12 |
* are often played on very small maps like Icy or trololo which makes them retardedly cramped.
|
16 |
* are often played on very small maps like Icy or trololo which makes them retardedly cramped.
|
13 |
\n
|
17 |
\n
|
14 |
And there's things that I mentioned earlier about not being nub-friendly:
|
18 |
And there's things that I mentioned earlier about not being nub-friendly:
|
15 |
* hard to learn introspectively: too low personal influence on outcome
|
19 |
* hard to learn introspectively: too low personal influence on outcome
|
16 |
* people usually don't care and won't give advice
|
20 |
* people usually don't care and won't give advice
|
17 |
* laggy, troll magnet, votespam in lobby (already mentioned above)
|
21 |
* laggy, troll magnet, votespam in lobby (already mentioned above)
|
18 |
[quote]Can you prove that the number of people retained by forcing small rooms is going to be bigger than the number of active players who will leave?[/quote]
|
22 |
[quote]Can you prove that the number of people retained by forcing small rooms is going to be bigger than the number of active players who will leave?[/quote]
|
19 |
No. [spoiler]I think there wouldn't be much actual loss (some rage and that's it), and even if so, I value the game quality improvement higher than a bunch of pluks.[/spoiler]
|
23 |
No. [spoiler]I think there wouldn't be much actual loss (some rage and that's it), and even if so, I value the game quality improvement higher than a bunch of pluks.[/spoiler]
|
20 |
\n
|
24 |
\n
|
21 |
[quote]Joining the biggest room is clearly a free choice.[/quote]
|
25 |
[quote]Joining the biggest room is clearly a free choice.[/quote]
|
22 |
Sure but that's not how humans work.
|
26 |
Sure but that's not how humans work.
|
23 |
[spoiler]For example: people might want a small game and kinda dislike large games but prefer a large game to no game. So they see no small teams room, join a big room, and stay there because they can get a game. But since they aren't sitting in the small room, the next such person comes in and sees the small room empty, so joins the big one etc.[/spoiler]
|
27 |
[spoiler]For example: people might want a small game and kinda dislike large games but prefer a large game to no game. So they see no small teams room, join a big room, and stay there because they can get a game. But since they aren't sitting in the small room, the next such person comes in and sees the small room empty, so joins the big one etc.[/spoiler]
|
24 |
\n
|
28 |
\n
|
25 |
[quote]Stop making excuses for lobbying for your personal interests under disguise of caring about some helpless minority which for some reason is uncapable of voicing their opinion. [/quote]
|
29 |
[quote]Stop making excuses for lobbying for your personal interests under disguise of caring about some helpless minority which for some reason is uncapable of voicing their opinion. [/quote]
|
26 |
That wasn't even supposed to be disguised. I personally think small games should be enforced for reasons above, and being crappy to nabs is just one of them. I felt like emphasizing on this particular reason because of the thread title.
|
30 |
That wasn't even supposed to be disguised. I personally think small games should be enforced for reasons above, and being crappy to nabs is just one of them. I felt like emphasizing on this particular reason because of the thread title.
|