1 |
MoO 3 had:
|
1 |
MoO 3 had:
|
2 |
Stupid automation (the game basically played itself) and not using this automation meant enormous micro managment.
|
2 |
Stupid automation (the game basically played itself) and not using this automation meant enormous micro managment.
|
3 |
It's battle system was dull and buggy.
|
3 |
It's battle system was dull and buggy.
|
4 |
AI was dumb and because of this the diplomacy was stupid as well.
|
4 |
AI was dumb and because of this the diplomacy was stupid as well.
|
5 |
\n
|
5 |
\n
|
6 |
In short words: don't judge the series on that awful game. MoO 2 is (in many people's eyes including mine) the best 4x game ever created. Like seriously go play it.
|
6 |
In short words: don't judge the series on that awful game. MoO 2 is (in many people's eyes including mine) the best 4x game ever created. Like seriously go play it.
|
7 |
\n
|
7 |
\n
|
8 |
[quote]Hoping for an XCom class reboot would be too much, but I suppose you never know.[/quote]
|
8 |
[quote]Hoping for an XCom class reboot would be too much, but I suppose you never know.[/quote]
|
9 |
Look up Xenonauts! It is basically UFO defense +++
|
9 |
Look up Xenonauts! It is basically UFO defense +++
|
10 |
It
is
a
really
good
game.
|
10 |
It
is
a
really
good
game
though
you
might
want
to
install
a
map
pack
since
maps
can
get
a
bit
repeaterive
after
a
while.
Oh
and
I
agree
with
Skasi
XCOM:
Enemy
Unknown
was
quite
disappointing
but
on
the
other
hand
it
is
just
a
different
game
(
which
is
fine
in
its
own
right)
.
|