Loading...
  OR  Zero-K Name:    Password:   

Post edit history

B355511 8 on Small Supreme Battlefield Dry (Multiplayer)

To display differences between versions, select one or more edits in the list using checkboxes and click "diff selected"
Post edit history
Date Editor Before After
6/6/2015 4:39:29 PMAUrankSnuggleBass before revert after revert
6/6/2015 4:37:58 PMAUrankSnuggleBass before revert after revert
6/6/2015 4:37:36 PMAUrankSnuggleBass before revert after revert
Before After
1 :facepalm: 1 :facepalm:
2 \n 2 \n
3 Why do people feel the need to blame like this? 3 Why do people feel the need to blame like this?
4 \n 4 \n
5 I have 200 elo on him. He wasn't expected to win. On top of which, my team had a bigger income the entire time, I simply had more planes. Instead of trying to establish blame, you need to look at what actually went wrong. 5 I have 200 elo on him. He wasn't expected to win. On top of which, my team had a bigger income the entire time, I simply had more planes. Instead of trying to establish blame, you need to look at what actually went wrong.
6 \n 6 \n
7 @Senaven 7 @Senaven
8 \n 8 \n
9 What I see: 9 What I see:
10 \n 10 \n
11 1) If you lose air, making bombers is useless, no matter how much your team bawws. Either focus on getting air back, or give it up and do something else like eco or provide endgame. 11 1) If you lose air, making bombers is useless, no matter how much your team bawws. Either focus on getting air back, or give it up and do something else like eco or provide endgame.
12 \n 12 \n
13 2) Big map = swifts are better than hawks. There's certainly an argument for mixing them, but not until larger numbers. Swifts are also better for soft ground control (gave me several free scorchers that game). 13 2) Big map = swifts are better than hawks. There's certainly an argument for mixing them, but not until larger numbers. Swifts are also better for soft ground control (gave me several free scorchers that game).
14 \n 14 \n
15 3) In this situation wind was a better choice than solar. 15 3) In this situation wind was a better choice than solar.
16 \n 16 \n
17 4) Not taking the reclaim near your start location until later cost you. 17 4) Not taking the reclaim near your start location until later cost you.
18 \n 18 \n
19 5) (and I did this too) There were unclaimed mex near you, which could have given your team an edge over ours since we fell victim to bystander effect too. 19 5) (and I did this too) There were unclaimed mex near you, which could have given your team an edge over ours since we fell victim to bystander effect too.
20 \n 20 \n
21 6) Despite all these things you could improve on, by far the biggest issue here was that your team lost ground and thus were out-expanded. Forcegod is only 1350 but captured all of North for free. This economic advantage snowballed air, mid, and bottom. You do what you can to help but as air player you do have limited control. 21 6) Despite all these things you could improve on, by far the biggest issue here was that your team lost ground and thus were out-expanded. Forcegod is only 1350 but captured all of North for free. This economic advantage snowballed air, mid, and bottom. You do what you can to help but as air player you do have limited control.
22 \n 22 \n
23 @banana_Ai
24 \n
23 See how none of this criticism was personal? Instead of just telling people they're bad you can open up discussion on what the mistakes were with a focus on improving. This flaming bullshit has to stop, especially when the criticism is misdirected. 25 See how none of this criticism was personal? Instead of just telling people they're bad you can open up discussion on what the mistakes were with a focus on improving. This flaming bullshit has to stop, especially when the criticism is misdirected.