| 1 |
However,
none
of
those
replays
were
1v1,
which
is
what
was
being
discussed.
I
don't
remember
http://zero-k.
info/Battles/Detail/349256
being
defined
by
defender
spam,
either;
wasn't
that
just
4hundred
running
the
other
team
over
with
double-com?
|
1 |
However,
none
of
those
replays
were
1v1,
which
is
what
was
being
discussed.
I
don't
remember
http://zero-k.
info/Battles/Detail/349256
being
defined
by
defender
spam,
either;
wasn't
that
just
4hundred
running
the
other
team
over
with
double-com?
Just
because
a
bunch
of
Defenders
get
built
doesn't
mean
necessarily
that
they
characterised
the
sum
direction
of
the
game.
|
| 3 |
This isn't an excellent map for 1v1 and probably doesn't rate inclusion in a list of "featured" maps but it's certainly good enough to be "supported", whenever that distinction is implemented. Most of the 1v1s I remember on this map were a bit curbstompy but mostly by virtue of the player matchups.
|
3 |
This isn't an excellent map for 1v1 and probably doesn't rate inclusion in a list of "featured" maps but it's certainly good enough to be "supported", whenever that distinction is implemented. Most of the 1v1s I remember on this map were a bit curbstompy but mostly by virtue of the player matchups.
|
Map Lowland Crossing Revised v2