Loading...
  OR  Zero-K Name:    Password:   

Post edit history

Overdrive, Underdrive and Quantum Mechanics

To display differences between versions, select one or more edits in the list using checkboxes and click "diff selected"
Post edit history
Date Editor Before After
1/4/2015 4:49:28 AMDErankBrackman before revert after revert
1/4/2015 12:34:18 AMDErankBrackman before revert after revert
Before After
1 I know you reported it @Skasi. The bug wasn't too easy to find, just like the ideal solution. If you and @TheEloIsALie didn't had found it, other people would have done so some months later (like me, but I was too late :P). I do respect you for having found it xD. 1 I know you reported it @Skasi. The bug wasn't too easy to find, just like the ideal solution. If you and @TheEloIsALie didn't had found it, other people would have done so some months later (like me, but I was too late :P). I do respect you for having found it xD.
2 \n 2 \n
3 I don't vote for a specific system of the 3. They are all good, especially compared to the current one. The higher numbered ones are definitely more elegant, but I guess people will prefer what is closest to the current one, even though the symmetric one has its advantages, too. 3 I don't vote for a specific system of the 3. They are all good, especially compared to the current one. The higher numbered ones are definitely more elegant, but I guess people will prefer what is closest to the current one, even though the symmetric one has its advantages, too.
4 \n
5 Note that any system must use its ideal solution (which the current one doesn't). Otherwise you can always find cases where building pylons reduces total metal rate (needs general proof).