| 1 |
I've
read
that
whitepaper
and
it
was
ambient
conditions.
Their
magnetron
was
airbreathing,
so
they
couldn't
test
the
device
in
vacuum.
They
tested
it
in
air.
|
1 |
I've
read
that
whitepaper
and
it
was
ambient
conditions.
Their
magnetron
was
airbreathing,
so
they
couldn't
test
the
device
in
vacuum.
They
tested
it
in
air,
and
in
gravity.
|
| 2 |
\n
|
2 |
\n
|
| 3 |
I don't hold it absolutely impossible that it was in fact generating thrust, but the way they demonstrated it so far was marred with imperfection.
|
3 |
I don't hold it absolutely impossible that it was in fact generating thrust, but the way they demonstrated it so far was marred with imperfection.
|
| 4 |
\n
|
4 |
\n
|
| 5 |
Another thing to take note here is how the difference in thrust reported between NASA and the chinese experiment was a whole order of magnitude.
|
5 |
Another thing to take note here is how the difference in thrust reported between NASA and the chinese experiment was a whole order of magnitude.
|
Newton's laws defiled by new propellantless microwave thruster.