Just purposely threw the game

Page of 3 (51 records)

sort
Antelope 12 years ago What else am I going to do when I get pitted against my clanmates? No individual soldier is more important than [V]. I gladly lay down my life for the greater good. /fix the balance please +0 / -0
[V]Odin 12 years ago Yeah i think battles must be always clan vs clan, no clanmate must be forced to play against his own clan. +0 / -0
SkuZzi 12 years ago I have to agree with that +0 / -0
FireX 12 years ago maybe it should WARN that context should sit out.. ? or he would fight be against his own clan. +0 / -0
[1uP]Willk 12 years ago I have to agree also, as Im getting sick and tired of the clan on both sides games, and the stupid cases where attacker and defender of a planet are on the same team. There needs to be NEEDS to be a stronger emphasis on Clans and Alliances, and War Decs. Elo should still be in the balance, but it shouldn't be such a strong factor that it messes up these. To me if the balance stack was 1.Same Clan 2.Different Teams due to War Dec. 3.Same Alliance 4.Balanced Elo then this wouldn't be as much of a problem. I also think "Cannot Balance" should occur before clanners end up on different teams. +0 / -0
Antelope 12 years ago Well it's not like I didn't actually do anything, FireX. I made the majority of the econ and countered with a 15 minute Detriment rush. I won the CA award, which means I was definitely doing SOMETHING right. But still, why should I be warned for not beating my clanmates? In one way (the battle) I lost on purpose, and in another way (PW) I won on purpose. I would rather lose a battle and win the war. +0 / -0
Antelope 12 years ago A link to the battle, if interested. +0 / -0
Antelope 12 years ago http://zero-k.info/Battles/Detail/20181 +0 / -0
[V]Odin 12 years ago well in fact if context would be on our team we would have conquered the planet, so everyone lose. +0 / -0
FireX 12 years ago context,you did great.Detriment rush XD. +0 / -0
GoogleFrog 12 years ago I can't really flaw someone for losing because it is a win in the metagame, which is one of the problems I foresaw with planetwars. +0 / -0
[V]Odin 12 years ago planetwars should be about clan vs clan. thats all i can say. +0 / -0
SkuZzi 12 years ago if itsn ot tell us whats it meant to be about or create a clan ladder type wars +0 / -0
frameworld 12 years ago It seems that WEE have to DECIDE about what PW REALLY IS: Should we make fair teams? ---- OR Should we even allow games like 1v1 games ( not vs allies or ceasfire clans ), so that every one collect IPs for the own team. -> Than alliances are the only way to make a big bulk of IPs and win the game. +0 / -0
[1uP]Willk 12 years ago Well 1v1 games aren't happening that often cause of the "Cannot Balance Fairly" function of the PW balancer, and I have nothing agianst fair teams. Games where clans are on both teams however, are in no way fair to the clan or the others, espcially when said clan is dropping on the planet. The same is true when attacker and defender clans are on the same team. Really the best solution is stronger clan stack, and stricter balance. This will fix the clan stack problems, and balancing can simply be fixed by clanners picking who to go if the balancer will not balance them. +0 / -0
frameworld 12 years ago I suggest to take the last 10 PW battles ( only games within the last 24 hours ), and multiply IP income through battles with 1 / ( 1+ victoryPercentage 2 ) Losers get between 20% and 7% IPs Winners get between 100% and 33% IPs In a total imbalanced battle ( eg. goode ( 2200elo ) vs [3do]stromgrid ( 1200elo ) ), winners get 33% and losers 20%. That's fair. Nobody can get the whole galaxy with playing against noobs. Additionally I would add a property "battles" for each object The value contains the number of played (battles players for this battle) AT THIS MAP ( whole session ). if 6 players fight one battle, the battle count 6 times sector.importance = ( sector.battles /galaxy.battles countSectors ) ( galaxy.importance \| 1 ) planet.importance = ( planet.battles /sector.battles countPlanets ) sector.importance Values multiplied with planet.importance: credits/IP ( trade with locals ) IPs from battles ( multiply with 1/planet.importance ) Income by taxes ( replace mining ) ... This would provide you more Credits/IPs for planets witch are in the favour of more other players. +0 / -0
[1uP]Willk 12 years ago Ion if I may quickly say, thats alot of coding and its completly off topic. We are discussing about issues with Clan balance, not spamming attacks agianst noobs, which the current system works preety well. +0 / -0
NeonSturm 12 years ago I know that we speak about balance, but I think if you have a chance to get IPs from losing than the peoples don't cry about imba games as many as now. +0 / -0
[1uP]Willk 12 years ago Meh, wouldn't change that feeling of imbalance, and still preety much off topic, as this had to do with the stupid games where same clan on both sides, or the attacker and defender of the planet are on the same time. Your idea is interesting, but please, make a new topic instead of posting it here. +0 / -0
Licho 12 years ago There is no such thing as attacker and defender. Those are not even clearly defined. +0 / -0

Page of 3 (51 records)

Forum index > General discussion > PlanetWars >