Disarm problems?

or add Slow too.

I don't really like disarm. I understand the motivation behind it's implementation, but it's just kind of lame.

I suggest bringing back the original stilleto (15+ sec paralyze) but make it a one-use kamikaze plane missile instead of a reusable bomber. It would have to cost less than 600m, but there would still be a cost to it's use.

The racketeer I would give slow damage instead of disarm. That way it's still a good assault-supressant but it can't be used to pin down coms and other large units like it used to.

I kinda like fortaleza's idea with slow. Maybe when a unit has its disarm filled, it then goes to slow damage.

quote: I suggest bringing back the original stilleto (15+ sec paralyze) but make it a one-use kamikaze plane missile instead of a reusable bomber. It would have to cost less than 600m, but there would still be a cost to it's use.

Since nobody has been able to properly balance that unit yet (is it so difficult to just try increasing its cost or just reducing emp duration?) i like that idea

disarm is fine as it is, imo its a good thing for stileto and rackteer, they could never work with normal emp.

i like forevers initial idea, stileto should really disarm for longer then a puny 11 sec...

quote: but since evryone usualy disagrees with me on principle: "my real feelings are as follows disarms is horible silly and i hates it it should be removed imediately and never return cause its silly and SILLY. so nerf nerf nerf nerf!!!" kr please disagree with me :P

Random thought: Reverse Fortaleza's idea and completely merge disarm with slow. Like, no distinction between a Slow weapon and a Disarm weapon. When a unit reaches maximum slow, it gets disarmed. Would make Moderators useful again (but might push Outlaws back into OPLaw land).