Loading...
  OR  Zero-K Name:    Password:   
Back to List

EvoRTS-Deserted_Gully-v01 Featured

By Forboding Angel
Rating:

Made by Forboding Angel
Size: 12 x 20

PLAY ON THIS MAP


Downloads: 8026
Manual downloads:
http://zero-k.info/content/maps/EvoRTS-Deserted_Gully-v01.sd7
http://api.springfiles.com/files/maps/evorts-deserted_gully-v01.sd7
https://zero-k.info/content/maps/EvoRTS-Deserted_Gully-v01.sd7
http://spring1.admin-box.com/downloads/spring/spring-maps/EvoRTS-Deserted_Gully-v01.sd7

Last battles

Bots B952156 3 on EvoRTS-Deserted_Gully-v01
Multiplayer B952150 4 on EvoRTS-Deserted_Gully-v01
Bots B950044 2 on EvoRTS-Deserted_Gully-v01
Bots B949198 3 on EvoRTS-Deserted_Gully-v01
Bots B949049 3 on EvoRTS-Deserted_Gully-v01
Bots B946822 3 on EvoRTS-Deserted_Gully-v01
Bots B946802 3 on EvoRTS-Deserted_Gully-v01
Bots B945684 3 on EvoRTS-Deserted_Gully-v01
Bots B945639 3 on EvoRTS-Deserted_Gully-v01
Bots B944835 6 on EvoRTS-Deserted_Gully-v01


Preview
Filter:    Player:  
sort
USrank[1uP]Willk
12 years ago
Very good map, a little porcy at the choke points, but good.
+0 / -0
Skasi
11 years ago
Base metal per spod should be reduced to decrease OD and the porc it generates. Number of metal spots can be increased to make up for the loss.
+0 / -0

USrank[Evo]ForbodingAngel
11 years ago
I really need to redo this. There are so many features on it that it hinders performance. Is pretty, but not worth the performance cost, sadly.
+0 / -0

AUrankAdminSaktoth
11 years ago
I don't think we have the features in Zero-K.
+0 / -0
USrank[1uP]Willk
11 years ago
No we don't. Its the same case of maps as Rivervalley. Featureplacer map that doesn't download due to dependencies.
+0 / -0


FIranksprang
11 years ago
For some reason it doesn't show a download link anymore.
+0 / -0
GBrankTheSponge
10 years ago
(edited 10 years ago)
Why is this abomination featured? It works fine with evo's spiders but in ZK it's a horrible porcfest without enough metal.
+0 / -0
PLrankOrfelius
10 years ago
(edited 10 years ago)
As far as asthetics wise this map is really nice to look at, but the problem lies in that 5 mins into the game it is just a porc fest. Notice that most games on this map are played by newb vs bot games. Thats because in most cases this map will be skipped by players once !map chooses it for them.
+3 / -0

AUrankAdminAquanim
10 years ago
quote:
If a map is skipped most of the time it comes up in a 1v1 lobby, and (to make up a number) 80% of the games on it are ridiculous and unfun, is it worth keeping for the sake of the remaining 20%?


Except replace 80% with... idk, 95% for this map? Valles Marineris has redeeming features at least.
+0 / -0
GBrankTheSponge
10 years ago
There haven't been any objections in 24 hours and I've never come across anyone who likes this map. Unfeaturing.
+1 / -1
Skasi
10 years ago
(edited 10 years ago)
quote:
Very good map, a little porcy at the choke points, but good.
- USrank[1uP]Willk

quote:
I've never come across anyone who likes this map.
- GBrankTheSponge
+3 / -0
USrankAdminJasper
10 years ago
(edited 10 years ago)
Nothing wrong with this map
+0 / -0


AUrankAdminGoogleFrog
10 years ago
I think it is an ok map. The middle porc gives someone an advantage so it is not a stalemate.
+1 / -0
USrankAdminJasper
9 years ago
Re-featured this is one of the better looking maps and it plays decent to.
+1 / -0

AUrankAdminAquanim
9 years ago
(edited 9 years ago)
...Really?

At least untag it for 1v1.
+0 / -0
PLrankOrfelius
9 years ago
(edited 9 years ago)
USrankAdminJasper have you played at least ONE game on this map?
Edit: Apperently you did - 23 months ago. Since then you have not even speced of how this map plays.
Please at least untag it with 1v1s for what I care :\
+0 / -0
USrankAdminJasper
9 years ago
This would be a horrible 1vs1 map un-tagged. I have played this map many times.
+0 / -0


AUrankAdminGoogleFrog
5 years ago
Featured.
+0 / -0
Back to List