Loading...
  OR  Zero-K Name:    Password:   

Separate ELO

16 posts, 1181 views
Post comment
Filter:    Player:  
sort

9 years ago
How about we have separate ELO one for Single 1 v 1 and another for large team games so that single high ELO players don't skew the balance? The balance could use a combination of their single and multiplayer ELO in case they just average out in multiplayers.

+0 / -0
This is already the case.
+4 / -0
9 years ago

Slowpoke image is 100% appropriate for this thread.
+7 / -0

9 years ago
http://zero-k.info/Ladders
+0 / -0
9 years ago
It's been set up like this for months.
+0 / -0
9 years ago
GBrankLiquid_Mind is an approperiate nickname for you indeed.
+1 / -0

9 years ago
It would be good if resources could somehow be shared between team members too.
+1 / -0
9 years ago
quote:
It would be good if resources could somehow be shared between team members too.

Maby you should rename to something simmilar too USrankkaen?
Like airhead or somesuch :P
because they are already
+1 / -0
Orfailius, you need to tune your sarcasm detectors. I think.
+8 / -0
Skasi
9 years ago
Yeah they are all shared.. to a single eco spammer.
+1 / -0
9 years ago
USrankkaen

+7 / -0

9 years ago
I've not played for a while until a week or so ago. So may have missed this!
+0 / -0
9 years ago
We still lack an FFA elo!!!! I'm pointing this again for no reason!!!
+1 / -0

9 years ago
FFA shares Elo with Teams. FFA and teams are deemed to have similar skill requirements which is why a separate FFA Elo isn't really necessary.
+0 / -0
FFA is also unpopular since it last longer than a chicken game and replaces fun with !FUN!

Good luck gathering enough FFA data for meaningful elo ranking, unless you do it solely based on metal efficiency...
+0 / -0
9 years ago
FFA mode is completely different from a teamgame, even if we are playing a FFA team game. And for the point about balancing uselessnesses, think about the function of 1vs1 elo: It's for ladders only too.
+2 / -0