Loading...
  OR  Zero-K Name:    Password:   
Title: [A] Teams All Welcome
Host: Nobody
Game version: Zero-K v1.8.2.7
Engine version: 104.0.1-1435-g79d77ca
Battle ID: 840682
Started: 4 years ago
Duration: 13 minutes
Players: 19
Bots: False
Mission: False
Rating: Casual
Watch Replay Now
Manual download

Team 1 Lost
Chance of victory: 40.5%
XP gained: 56
FRrankSlaab died in 8 minutes
ILrankChomolungma died in 9 minutes
GBrankbombman died in 4 minutes
RUrank[tre]PAK died in 13 minutes
RUrankGabrielle died in 13 minutes
UArankVadimVorenas died in 13 minutes
UArankstrikingsword died in 13 minutes
USrankGrizzlie died in 8 minutes
USrankAutoWar died in 13 minutes
Team 2 Won!
Chance of victory: 59.5%
XP gained: 66
USrankSentinelComanche
FIrankKapy
DErankshrimpy
DErankJummy
ESranklordtaim
RUrankOntheheavens
PTrankSkender
DErankWiseMonk
FIrankTacety
USrankdarkhunter6243




Preview
Filter:    Player:  
sort
4 years ago
Guys, could anybody check please why is toxic behavior still present in Zero-K?
I started in the upper left, right after me another player titles Kabudasa chose this place to start near me. Sounds okay, but why it so necessary to block metal spots with nano frames and prevent me to build on it? I left this place due to his disgusting behavior, no excuse, just label "go go go". So this match is not look a team game anymore, no wonder we lost.
+0 / -0

4 years ago
Since metal is shared, the person who builds or owns the metal extractor is entirely irrelevant. As for labels, well, you threw the first insult.
+1 / -0
4 years ago
Dead friend, you either lie or cover old high ranked player once again, moreover, you are biased towards newbies. Did you check the replay? Since the start the battle there was no any "insult" from me, not a word either. As you can see from 0 to 14 seconds he took all the spots with nanoframes, even last third I wanted to take he also place nanoframe just in time. Of course my reaction was after, coward he is, or I should just to swallow it? Did you see what he wrote? "Go go" for me sounds like get out from this place.
+0 / -0
You called him a "coward" before he said a word to you. Once again, it does not matter who places the nanoframes since metal income is shared.

I don't know that him choosing to plop in the back corner after you is super polite but most of the other things you have said are at best misleading.
+2 / -0
4 years ago
Okay, I see, you covering him anyway. He denied the spots with frame not completing it, hу did it on purpose, so hard to see. Well okay. I just go away,
it is useless to seek truth here.
+0 / -0
4 years ago
The point was not about metal sharing, the point is about blocking the place and spots with nanos. We did many battles together with other player, everytime all things was just perfect, teamship and cooperation, but this blocking behavior is just disappointing.
+0 / -0


4 years ago
I would agree that @kabudasa was about as much of a jerk here as he could be under the constraint of shared metal income. The fact is that all his screwing around had (almost) no effect. The blocking behaviour is disappointing. Just make a normal moderation report. It isn't worth starting all this nonsense over it.

RUrankGabrielle - You do not need to personally construct a Mex to gain its income.

https://zero-k.info/mediawiki/index.php?title=Economy_Guide#Metal
+1 / -0
4 years ago
Dear GoogleFrog, I'm sorry to take your time here. I completed the single campaign last year and played many team battles, I know about metal sharing logic, it's perfectly clear and not write about it here in the first post.

It really jsut "The blocking behaviour is disappointing.". Okay, anyway, really sorry for bickering, I'm still very polite.
+0 / -0

4 years ago
polite means very little.

you think this guy was mean to you, so you want to get him back.

Just called him an asshole and be done with it.
+0 / -0