Battle 789383 detail

Team 1 Lost
Chance of victory: 36.8%
XP gained: 25

izirayd died in 12 minutes Turtle Shell, Damaged value: 6,961

Znack died in 14 minutes Decorated Veteran, Lotus, 1317% cost made

Nataximu died in 9 minutes

cnote68 died in 14 minutes Traffic Cop, Slowed value: 9,204

Ayarith died in 6 minutes

Team 2 Won!
Chance of victory: 63.2%
XP gained: 50

[GBC]HarveyN Spoils of War, Reclaimed value: 3,151

Huixtocihuatl

Firepluk died in 12 minutes Master and Commander, Damaged value: 10,108

n2o

NanoPirate

XeL

Spectators

spaci

manero
snoke

SoftwareBug

gounson8989

Filter: Player:

sort
izirayd 5 years ago One of those games where I would like to get the double metal that Zenfur spoke about +2 / -0
izirayd 5 years ago I want to get a live player who will go to any line and do at least something useful, and not a useless commander. Will two opponents play against me right away on the line, what should I oppose them? +0 / -0
izirayd 5 years ago I used to think that two commanders is okay, but then I began to notice how I lose games if I get two commanders more often. Now I have reached higher positions and have a lot of elo and now just if I get two commanders, I lose guaranteed +0 / -0
izirayd 5 years ago Maybe it's paranoia, but what the hell +0 / -0
malric 5 years ago Probably best way is to ask (someone) for the database and check numerically if it is the case - having 2 commanders means that team loses ... In the end might be true for some people and not for others, so hard to make generic claims without checking +0 / -0
malric 5 years ago Oh, and will be much more unforgiving the less players they are. Even I managed with 2 coms in 12v11 (https://zero-k.info/Battles/Detail/789095) +0 / -0

Zero-K is a free real time strategy (RTS), that aims to be the best open source multi-platform strategy game available :-)