Loading...
  OR  Zero-K Name:    Password:   
Title: Zero-K: All Welcome
Host: CZrankSpringiee
Game version: Zero-K v1.3.8.14
Engine version: 100.0
Battle ID: 374335
Started: 9 years ago
Duration: 15 minutes
Players: 26
Bots: False
Mission: False
Rating: Casual
Watch Replay Now
Manual download

Team 2
Chance of victory: 60.7%

DErankChesti
NLrankmalric
RUrankFirepluk
LVrankSenaven
snoke
RUrank[tre]PAK
ATrankBigMac
ATrankHutti
NLrank[NC]Gretchen
UArankDIVO
USrankpear
USranknatch
DEranklAkim

Show winners



Preview
Filter:    Player:  
sort

9 years ago
game after this game desynced, because one spectator desynced.. now it didnt count
+0 / -0
"PENALTY: Deliberately damaging an allied commander with bombers, almost killing it: http://zero-k.info/Battles/Detail/374335"

Seriously? Why are players not notified before they get punished, so they can defend. Was I reported? If you want to mess around like this I can report 50% of players each game trolling and violating CoC.

PLrankIN98ASP did you report me? I will report you back then and look up all replays where you made silly fortresses or rushed detriments to harm the team.

"Try to act and coordinate for the mutual success of the whole team. In a team game, cooperating, coordinating and planning strategies as a group will lead to greater success and a better team atmosphere. Realize that a player with higher Elo probably knows what they are talking about. Do not wilfully make things worse for your allies." This is clearly violated copiously.

"In a team game, players are expected to play to the best of their ability and refrain from knowingly compromising the team's chances of victory. "

"Do something that you know or have good reason to believe will significantly reduce the team's chances of victory, even when your team asks you not to "

" Do something that you know or have good reason to believe is very likely to result in defeat for your team, without the express consent of your team. "
+1 / -0
9 years ago
The greatest banhammer demands blood
+2 / -0

9 years ago
You write too much burp. I think he even don't read it.
I can agree that 50% players is worth of punishment in team games.
Useless ban i think. Now you can start trolling every game.
+0 / -0

9 years ago
It was not PLrankIN98ASP.

Randomly targeting him with revenge reports would probably be discouraged.
+2 / -0
PLrankAdminSprung: Why would I do that if it wasn't him? I do not target randomly with revenge reports.



Why is this considered to be OK but dropping a few bombs on his com in the fortress 2 minutes before it dies anyway due to !resign not? I try to communicate with people (or make them clear for example like in this case) that I'm not OK with what they do, rather than reporting them. And unlike him, I did no harm to the game or team at this point.
+0 / -0

9 years ago
because
quote:
IN98ASP did you report me? I will report you back then
+0 / -0
PLrankAdminSprung Do you see the questionmark? I asked if it was him. (How would you know anyway?)
+0 / -0
You were bullying PLrankIN98ASP.

However, I determined a 5 hour ban was too much. I reduced it to about 3.
+0 / -0

9 years ago
Fair enough. But even if you knew it was him, revenge reports for old replays aren't okay to do imo.

(I know from the admin report interface.)
+0 / -0


9 years ago
IN98ASP is lvl 42 - I think it would have been fair game to repeatedly initiate vote kick.
+0 / -0