Loading...
  OR  Zero-K Name:    Password:   
Map: BlackStar
 BlackStar
Title: FFA: All welcome!
Host: CZrankNeon
Game version: Zero-K v1.3.3.8
Engine version: 98.0.1-451-g0804ae1
Battle ID: 340627
Started: 9 years ago
Duration: 63 minutes
Players: 6
Bots: False
Mission: False
Rating: Casual
Watch Replay Now
Manual download

Team 1 Lost
Chance of victory: 0.6%
XP gained: 99
RUrankPrototypestill died in 65 minutes
Team 2 Lost
Chance of victory: 1.3%
XP gained: 99
USrankSarab died in 55 minutes
Team 3 Lost
Chance of victory: 66%
XP gained: 99
DErankChesti died in 29 minutes
Team 4 Lost
Chance of victory: 7.5%
XP gained: 99
DErankCaptainKlutz died in 20 minutes
Team 5 Won!
Chance of victory: 24.6%
XP gained: 117
RUrankYogzototh
USrankSnugglePugs
Spectators
EErankAdminAnarchid
FRrankSlaab
FRrankHelwor
NLrankPersius




Preview
Filter:    Player:  
sort
RUrankYogzototh
9 years ago
I am surprised i have managed to win this despite the worst possible handicap.
+1 / -0

DErankChesti
9 years ago
You didn't manage to win this. Your ally played well for you and Sarab help it too despite you had mid he didn't attack u, he attack me together with u and your teammate.
+0 / -0
RUrankYogzototh
9 years ago
(edited 9 years ago)
quote:
Your ally played well

Compared to you, maybe.

But i dont consider puppyspam and slamming tacnukes at shields as an efficient investment of 50% of my income. I mean sure, it could be worse, but i was still basically playing at a 50% income penalty.
+0 / -0

DErankChesti
9 years ago
I just talked about the synchronized attacks he did :)
+0 / -0
RUrankYogzototh
9 years ago
quote:
I just talked about the synchronized attacks he did :)

Did he?

Really, Sarab attacking you had way more impact on the game than what SnugglePugs did. I am not even sure if i could have won if he didnt attack.
+0 / -0
BErankFlipstip
9 years ago
rematch?
+0 / -0