Battle 123575 detail

sort
Anarchid 12 years ago (edited 12 years ago) Hide and seek with waterlevel=125 (or maybe even 140) is best idea ever. It's not even ugly anymore. +0 / -0
[0C]Tandstickor 12 years ago This map would still be ugly with waterlevel=9001 +0 / -0
Anarchid 12 years ago Definitely! But with 140, it's less ugly than either with 0 or 100500. +0 / -0
[0C]Tandstickor 12 years ago That center hill looks silly and the height map is dirty, by lack of a better word. +0 / -0
Kyubey 12 years ago water level really breakes pathing, can we fix that? +0 / -0
[0C]Tandstickor 12 years ago it does? I think it just takes some time before all the paths are updated after the water level changes. Or is there someway to force the engine to recalculate the paths? +0 / -0
[2up]knorke 12 years ago http://springrts.com/phpbb/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=28901 +0 / -0
Saktoth 12 years ago Wait we can change the waterlevel now? Why do we have wet/dry versions of maps then we should just have a wet toggle. +0 / -0
GoogleFrog 12 years ago We have been able to change water level for at least 2 years. I forget when I added it but it is before this svn. The path cacher does not like water level changes, it will often break global path finding entirely. Also you don't get a well textured shore. +0 / -0